mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quadratic Gating Mixture of Experts: Statistical Insights into Self-Attention

arXiv 2410.11222 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture of Experts (MoE) models are well known for effectively scaling model capacity while preserving computational overheads. In this paper, we establish a rigorous relation between MoE and the self-attention mechanism, showing that each row of a self-attention matrix can be written as a quadratic gating mixture of linear experts. Motivated by this connection, we conduct a comprehensive convergence analysis of MoE models with two different quadratic gating functions, namely the quadratic polynomial gate and the quadratic monomial gate, offering useful insights into the design of gating and experts for the MoE framework. First, our analysis indicates that the use of the quadratic monomial gate yields an improved sample efficiency for estimating parameters and experts compared to the quadratic polynomial gate. Second, parameter and expert estimation rates become significantly faster when employing non-linear experts in place of linear experts. Combining these theoretical insights with the above link between MoE and self-attention, we propose a novel active-attention mechanism where we apply a non-linear activation function to the value matrix in the formula of self-attention. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed active-attention outperforms the standard self-attention through several extensive experiments in various tasks, including image classification, language modeling, and multivariate time series forecasting.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 12 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

Builds on

12 of 71 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024On Expert Estimation in Hierarchical Mixture of Experts: Beyond Softmax Gating Functions3 Oct

Other references · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  5. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  6. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  7. 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 834
  8. 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
  9. 2024Flex-MoE: Modeling Arbitrary Modality Combination via the Flexible Mixture-of-Expertscited by 69
  10. 2018Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)cited by 43
  11. 2024Distributionally Robust Receive Combiningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Optimal Expert-Attention Allocation in Mixture-of-Experts: A Scalable Law for Dynamic Model Design
  2. 2026A Statistical Theory of Gated Attention through the Lens of Hierarchical Mixture of Experts
  3. 2024Sigmoid Gating is More Sample Efficient than Softmax Gating in Mixture of Experts
  4. 2018Breaking the gridlock in Mixture-of-Experts: Consistent and Efficient Algorithms
  5. 2025Convergence Rates for Softmax Gating Mixture of Experts
  6. 2023Revisiting Single-gated Mixtures of Experts
  7. 2023Towards Convergence Rates for Parameter Estimation in Gaussian-gated Mixture of Experts
  8. 2025Beyond Benchmarks: Understanding Mixture-of-Experts Models through Internal Mechanisms