Understanding Robustness of Parameter-Efficient Tuning for Image Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Parameter-efficient tuning (PET) techniques calibrate the model's predictions on downstream tasks by freezing the pre-trained models and introducing a small number of learnable parameters. However, despite the numerous PET methods proposed, their robustness has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we systematically explore the robustness of four classical PET techniques (e.g., VPT, Adapter, AdaptFormer, and LoRA) under both white-box attacks and information perturbations. For white-box attack scenarios, we first analyze the performance of PET techniques using FGSM and PGD attacks. Subsequently, we further explore the transferability of adversarial samples and the impact of learnable parameter quantities on the robustness of PET methods. Under information perturbation attacks, we introduce four distinct perturbation strategies, including Patch-wise Drop, Pixel-wise Drop, Patch Shuffle, and Gaussian Noise, to comprehensively assess the robustness of these PET techniques in the presence of information loss. Via these extensive studies, we enhance the understanding of the robustness of PET methods, providing valuable insights for improving their performance in computer vision applications. The code is available at https://github.com/JCruan519/PETRobustness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.
Builds on
29 of 32 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
17 more
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
- 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
- 2024LLaMA-MoE: Building Mixture-of-Experts from LLaMA with Continual Pre-trainingcited by 123
- 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 121
- 2021A Survey of Visual Transformerscited by 117
- 2022ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 85
- 2023Towards Efficient Visual Adaption via Structural Re-parameterizationcited by 73
- 2023Visual Tuningcited by 34
- 2023LAMM: Label Alignment for Multi-Modal Prompt Learningcited by 15
- 2023GIST: Improving Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning via Knowledge Interactioncited by 8
- 2024iDAT: inverse Distillation Adapter-Tuningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.