mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LAMM: Label Alignment for Multi-Modal Prompt Learning

arXiv 2312.08212 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the success of pre-trained visual-language (VL) models such as CLIP in visual representation tasks, transferring pre-trained models to downstream tasks has become a crucial paradigm. Recently, the prompt tuning paradigm, which draws inspiration from natural language processing (NLP), has made significant progress in VL field. However, preceding methods mainly focus on constructing prompt templates for text and visual inputs, neglecting the gap in class label representations between the VL models and downstream tasks. To address this challenge, we introduce an innovative label alignment method named LAMM, which can dynamically adjust the category embeddings of downstream datasets through end-to-end training. Moreover, to achieve a more appropriate label distribution, we propose a hierarchical loss, encompassing the alignment of the parameter space, feature space, and logits space. We conduct experiments on 11 downstream vision datasets and demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance of existing multi-modal prompt learning models in few-shot scenarios, exhibiting an average accuracy improvement of 2.31(%) compared to the state-of-the-art methods on 16 shots. Moreover, our methodology exhibits the preeminence in continual learning compared to other prompt tuning methods. Importantly, our method is synergistic with existing prompt tuning methods and can boost the performance on top of them. Our code and dataset will be publicly available at https://github.com/gaojingsheng/LAMM.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  3. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  4. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  5. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  6. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  9. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  10. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  12. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
5 more
  1. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  2. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  3. 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 319
  4. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
  5. 2022Open-Vocabulary DETR with Conditional Matchingcited by 220

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: