EMWaveNet: Physically Explainable Neural Network Based on Electromagnetic Propagation for SAR Target Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning technologies have significantly improved performance in the field of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image target recognition compared to traditional methods. However, the inherent ``black box" property of deep learning models leads to a lack of transparency in decision-making processes, making them difficult to be widespread applied in practice. To tackle this issue, this study proposes a physically explainable framework for complex-valued SAR image recognition, designed based on the physical process of microwave propagation. This framework utilizes complex-valued SAR data to explore the amplitude and phase information and its intrinsic physical properties. The network architecture is fully parameterized, with all learnable parameters endowed with clear physical meanings. Experiments on both the complex-valued MSTAR dataset and a self-built Qilu-1 complex-valued dataset were conducted to validate the effectiveness of framework. The de-overlapping capability of EMWaveNet enables accurate recognition of overlapping target categories, whereas other models are nearly incapable of performing such recognition. Against 0dB forest background noise, it boasts a 20% accuracy improvement over traditional neural networks. When targets are 60% masked by noise, it still outperforms other models by 9%. An end-to-end complex-valued synthetic aperture radar automatic target recognition (SAR-ATR) algorithm is constructed to perform recognition tasks in interference SAR scenarios. The results demonstrate that the proposed method possesses a strong physical decision logic, high physical explainability and robustness, as well as excellent de-aliasing capabilities. Finally, a perspective on future applications is provided.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.
Builds on
19 of 50 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Deep Complex Networkscited by 215
- 2018All-Optical Machine Learning Using Diffractive Deep Neural Networkscited by 175
- 2015Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networkscited by 168
- 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
- 2020Learning Diverse and Discriminative Representations via the Principle of Maximal Coding Rate Reductioncited by 141
- 2018Interpreting CNNs via Decision Treescited by 89
7 more
- 2021ReduNet: A White-box Deep Network from the Principle of Maximizing Rate Reductioncited by 84
- 2021Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 80
- 2023White-Box Transformers via Sparse Rate Reductioncited by 77
- 2014PCANet: A Simple Deep Learning Baseline for Image Classification?cited by 70
- 2017Gabor Convolutional Networkscited by 55
- 2021Physically Explainable CNN for SAR Image Classificationcited by 16
- 2023Closed-Loop Transcription via Convolutional Sparse Codingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.