mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Survival of the Safest: Towards Secure Prompt Optimization through Interleaved Multi-Objective Evolution

arXiv 2410.09652 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities; however, the optimization of their prompts has historically prioritized performance metrics at the expense of crucial safety and security considerations. To overcome this shortcoming, we introduce "Survival of the Safest" (SoS), an innovative multi-objective prompt optimization framework that enhances both performance and security in LLMs simultaneously. SoS utilizes an interleaved multi-objective evolution strategy, integrating semantic, feedback, and crossover mutations to effectively traverse the prompt landscape. Differing from the computationally demanding Pareto front methods, SoS provides a scalable solution that expedites optimization in complex, high-dimensional discrete search spaces while keeping computational demands low. Our approach accommodates flexible weighting of objectives and generates a pool of optimized candidates, empowering users to select prompts that optimally meet their specific performance and security needs. Experimental evaluations across diverse benchmark datasets affirm SoS's efficacy in delivering high performance and notably enhancing safety and security compared to single-objective methods. This advancement marks a significant stride towards the deployment of LLM systems that are both high-performing and secure across varied industrial applications

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  2. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  4. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  5. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  6. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
  7. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  8. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  9. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  10. 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 225
  11. 2023EvoPrompt: Connecting LLMs with Evolutionary Algorithms Yields Powerful Prompt Optimizerscited by 189
  12. 2022Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptionscited by 152
3 more
  1. 2024Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 150
  2. 2024RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Contentcited by 65
  3. 2023InstOptima: Evolutionary Multi-objective Instruction Optimization via Large Language Model-based Instruction Operatorscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.