mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Increasing the Difficulty of Automatically Generated Questions via Reinforcement Learning with Synthetic Preference

arXiv 2410.08289 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

As the cultural heritage sector increasingly adopts technologies like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to provide more personalised search experiences and enable conversations with collections data, the demand for specialised evaluation datasets has grown. While end-to-end system testing is essential, it's equally important to assess individual components. We target the final, answering task, which is well-suited to Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC). Although existing MRC datasets address general domains, they lack the specificity needed for cultural heritage information. Unfortunately, the manual creation of such datasets is prohibitively expensive for most heritage institutions. This paper presents a cost-effective approach for generating domain-specific MRC datasets with increased difficulty using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) from synthetic preference data. Our method leverages the performance of existing question-answering models on a subset of SQuAD to create a difficulty metric, assuming that more challenging questions are answered correctly less frequently. This research contributes: (1) A methodology for increasing question difficulty using PPO and synthetic data; (2) Empirical evidence of the method's effectiveness, including human evaluation; (3) An in-depth error analysis and study of emergent phenomena; and (4) An open-source codebase and set of three llama-2-chat adapters for reproducibility and adaptation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 48 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  9. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  10. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  11. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
  12. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
11 more
  1. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  2. 2023Grounding Large Language Models in Interactive Environments with Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 193
  3. 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
  4. 2023Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluatorscited by 71
  5. 2019Reinforcement Learning Based Graph-to-Sequence Model for Natural Question Generationcited by 57
  6. 2022UnifiedQA-v2: Stronger Generalization via Broader Cross-Format Trainingcited by 57
  7. 2018Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systemscited by 52
  8. 2021Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through Step-by-Step Rewritingcited by 30
  9. 2022RQUGE: Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Question Generation by Answering the Questioncited by 17
  10. 2022QAScore -- An Unsupervised Unreferenced Metric for the Question Generation Evaluationcited by 9
  11. 2019Generative Question Refinement with Deep Reinforcement Learning in Retrieval-based QA Systemcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Prompt Generate Train (PGT): Few-shot Domain Adaption of Retrieval Augmented Generation Models for Open Book Question-Answering
  2. 2025VaseVQA: Multimodal Agent and Benchmark for Ancient Greek Pottery
  3. 2025Can we Evaluate RAGs with Synthetic Data?
  4. 2026S3-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data
  5. 2026Bridging Static and Agentic RAG for Taiwanese Historical Question Answering
  6. 2024Consistency Training by Synthetic Question Generation for Conversational Question Answering
  7. 2024Balancing Cost and Effectiveness of Synthetic Data Generation Strategies for LLMs
  8. 2025Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge