Plug-and-Play Performance Estimation for LLM Services without Relying on Labeled Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM) services exhibit impressive capability on unlearned tasks leveraging only a few examples by in-context learning (ICL). However, the success of ICL varies depending on the task and context, leading to heterogeneous service quality. Directly estimating the performance of LLM services at each invocation can be laborious, especially requiring abundant labeled data or internal information within the LLM. This paper introduces a novel method to estimate the performance of LLM services across different tasks and contexts, which can be "plug-and-play" utilizing only a few unlabeled samples like ICL. Our findings suggest that the negative log-likelihood and perplexity derived from LLM service invocation can function as effective and significant features. Based on these features, we utilize four distinct meta-models to estimate the performance of LLM services. Our proposed method is compared against unlabeled estimation baselines across multiple LLM services and tasks. And it is experimentally applied to two scenarios, demonstrating its effectiveness in the selection and further optimization of LLM services.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 344
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 162
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
- 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 145
- 2021CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPcited by 142
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
8 more
- 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 116
- 2021Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Surveycited by 109
- 2023Fly-Swat or Cannon? Cost-Effective Language Model Choice via Meta-Modelingcited by 95
- 2023Which Tokens to Use? Investigating Token Reduction in Vision Transformerscited by 60
- 2022Estimating Model Performance under Domain Shifts with Class-Specific Confidence Scorescited by 10
- 2023Estimating Large Language Model Capabilities without Labeled Test Datacited by 9
- 2022Assessing Out-of-Domain Language Model Performance from Few Examplescited by 6
- 2024A Framework for Effective Invocation Methods of Various LLM Servicescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.