mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SAGE: Scalable Ground Truth Evaluations for Large Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2410.07456 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

A key challenge in interpretability is to decompose model activations into meaningful features. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising tool for this task. However, a central problem in evaluating the quality of SAEs is the absence of ground truth features to serve as an evaluation gold standard. Current evaluation methods for SAEs are therefore confronted with a significant trade-off: SAEs can either leverage toy models or other proxies with predefined ground truth features; or they use extensive prior knowledge of realistic task circuits. The former limits the generalizability of the evaluation results, while the latter limits the range of models and tasks that can be used for evaluations. We introduce SAGE: Scalable Autoencoder Ground-truth Evaluation, a ground truth evaluation framework for SAEs that scales to large state-of-the-art SAEs and models. We demonstrate that our method can automatically identify task-specific activations and compute ground truth features at these points. Compared to previous methods we reduce the training overhead by introducing a novel reconstruction method that allows to apply residual stream SAEs to sublayer activations. This eliminates the need for SAEs trained on every task-specific activation location. Then we validate the scalability of our framework, by evaluating SAEs on novel tasks on Pythia70M, GPT-2 Small, and Gemma-2-2. Our framework therefore paves the way for generalizable, large-scale evaluations of SAEs in interpretability research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 29 Aug
  2. 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control14 May

Other references · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,368
  6. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,968
  7. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,761
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,391
  9. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,145
  10. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,009
  11. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 940
  12. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 711
13 more
  1. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 544
  2. 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 536
  3. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 423
  4. 2023Large Language Models in Finance: A Surveycited by 226
  5. 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 200
  6. 2023Linear Representations of Sentiment in Large Language Modelscited by 161
  7. 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 145
  8. 2023Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safetycited by 98
  9. 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 78
  10. 2022X-Risk Analysis for AI Researchcited by 60
  11. 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
  12. 2022Interpreting Neural Networks through the Polytope Lenscited by 33
  13. 2020Large Scale Legal Text Classification Using Transformer Modelscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?
  2. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  3. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders
  4. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Tasks
  5. 2025Attribution-Guided Distillation of Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders
  6. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?
  7. 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
  8. 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoders