mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting the Performance of Decentralized Federated Learning via Catalyst Acceleration

arXiv 2410.07272 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized Federated Learning has emerged as an alternative to centralized architectures due to its faster training, privacy preservation, and reduced communication overhead. In decentralized communication, the server aggregation phase in Centralized Federated Learning shifts to the client side, which means that clients connect with each other in a peer-to-peer manner. However, compared to the centralized mode, data heterogeneity in Decentralized Federated Learning will cause larger variances between aggregated models, which leads to slow convergence in training and poor generalization performance in tests. To address these issues, we introduce Catalyst Acceleration and propose an acceleration Decentralized Federated Learning algorithm called DFedCata. It consists of two main components: the Moreau envelope function, which primarily addresses parameter inconsistencies among clients caused by data heterogeneity, and Nesterov's extrapolation step, which accelerates the aggregation phase. Theoretically, we prove the optimization error bound and generalization error bound of the algorithm, providing a further understanding of the nature of the algorithm and the theoretical perspectives on the hyperparameter choice. Empirically, we demonstrate the advantages of the proposed algorithm in both convergence speed and generalization performance on CIFAR10/100 with various non-iid data distributions. Furthermore, we also experimentally verify the theoretical properties of DFedCata.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

39 of 60 references.

References · 39

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  5. 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 555
  6. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  7. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  8. 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 401
  9. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
  10. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 353
  11. 2020Personalized Federated Learning with First Order Model Optimizationcited by 201
  12. 2013Minimizing Finite Sums with the Stochastic Average Gradientcited by 164
27 more
  1. 2020Mime: Mimicking Centralized Stochastic Algorithms in Federated Learningcited by 152
  2. 2022Generalized Federated Learning via Sharpness Aware Minimizationcited by 144
  3. 2020FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Datacited by 143
  4. 2022Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challengescited by 137
  5. 2021Decentralized Federated Averagingcited by 114
  6. 2022Improving Generalization in Federated Learning by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 98
  7. 2023Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 86
  8. 2019Peer-to-peer Federated Learning on Graphscited by 85
  9. 2014A Proximal Stochastic Gradient Method with Progressive Variance Reductioncited by 78
  10. 2021FedCM: Federated Learning with Client-level Momentumcited by 77
  11. 2022DisPFL: Towards Communication-Efficient Personalized Federated Learning via Decentralized Sparse Trainingcited by 74
  12. 2021Personalized Federated Learning through Local Memorizationcited by 57
  13. 2015A Universal Catalyst for First-Order Optimizationcited by 54
  14. 2023FedSpeed: Larger Local Interval, Less Communication Round, and Higher Generalization Accuracycited by 49
  15. 2023Improving the Model Consistency of Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 45
  16. 2022Federated Learning via Inexact ADMMcited by 44
  17. 2017Catalyst Acceleration for First-order Convex Optimization: from Theory to Practicecited by 39
  18. 2021Stability of SGD: Tightness Analysis and Improved Boundscited by 33
  19. 2020Privacy Amplification by Decentralizationcited by 28
  20. 2023A Survey on Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 27
  21. 2023Understanding How Consistency Works in Federated Learning via Stage-wise Relaxed Initializationcited by 21
  22. 2023PerAda: Parameter-Efficient Federated Learning Personalization with Generalization Guaranteescited by 15
  23. 2023Stability and Generalization of the Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent Ascent Algorithmcited by 8
  24. 2023DFedADMM: Dual Constraints Controlled Model Inconsistency for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 6
  25. 2018A Fast Anderson-Chebyshev Acceleration for Nonlinear Optimizationcited by 5
  26. 2023Asymmetrically Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 5
  27. 2020An acceleration of decentralized SGD under general assumptions with low stochastic noisecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.