mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CheXalign: Preference fine-tuning in chest X-ray interpretation models without human feedback

arXiv 2410.07025 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Medical LLM alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Radiologists play a crucial role in translating medical images into actionable reports. However, the field faces staffing shortages and increasing workloads. While automated approaches using vision-language models (VLMs) show promise as assistants, they require exceptionally high accuracy. Most current VLMs in radiology rely solely on supervised fine-tuning. Meanwhile, additional preference fine-tuning in the post-training pipeline has become standard practice in the general domain. The challenge in radiology lies in the prohibitive cost of obtaining radiologist feedback at scale. To address this challenge, we propose an automated pipeline for preference feedback, focusing on chest X-ray radiology report generation (RRG). Specifically, our method leverages publicly available datasets containing pairs of images and radiologist-written reference reports with reference-based metrics, or Judges, eliminating the need for additional radiologist feedback. We investigate reward overoptimization via length exploitation in this setting and introduce a length-controlled version of the GREEN score. Our best-performing setup achieves state-of-the-art CheXbert scores on the MIMIC-CXR dataset for the RRG task while on average maintaining robust performance across six additional image perception and reasoning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical LLM alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

31 of 67 references.

References · 31

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  12. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
19 more
  1. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  2. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  3. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  4. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  5. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  6. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 703
  7. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  8. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
  9. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  10. 2021SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 444
  11. 2020CheXbert: Combining Automatic Labelers and Expert Annotations for Accurate Radiology Report Labeling Using BERTcited by 329
  12. 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 197
  13. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
  14. 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
  15. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 139
  16. 2024GREEN: Generative Radiology Report Evaluation and Error Notationcited by 124
  17. 2023PromptMRG: Diagnosis-Driven Prompts for Medical Report Generationcited by 92
  18. 2024A Vision-Language Foundation Model to Enhance Efficiency of Chest X-ray Interpretationcited by 79
  19. 2023Rad-ReStruct: A Novel VQA Benchmark and Method for Structured Radiology Reportingcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CheXPO: Preference Optimization for Chest X-ray VLMs with Counterfactual Rationale
  2. 2026DobicVLM: Aligning Chest X-Ray Report Generation with Clinically-Grounded Programmatic Rewards via Group Relative Policy Optimization
  3. 2023Longitudinal Data and a Semantic Similarity Reward for Chest X-Ray Report Generation
  4. 2026Positive-Unlabeled Preference Optimization For Chest X-ray Report Generation
  5. 2026CXRMate-2: Structured Multimodal Temporal Embeddings and Tractable Reinforcement Learning for Clinically Acceptable Chest X-ray Radiology Report Generation
  6. 2026CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement
  7. 2025A Generative Framework for Bidirectional Image-Report Understanding in Chest Radiography
  8. 2024CXR-Agent: Vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation with uncertainty aware radiology reporting