The Last Iterate Advantage: Empirical Auditing and Principled Heuristic Analysis of Differentially Private SGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a simple heuristic privacy analysis of noisy clipped stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) in the setting where only the last iterate is released and the intermediate iterates remain hidden. Namely, our heuristic assumes a linear structure for the model. We show experimentally that our heuristic is predictive of the outcome of privacy auditing applied to various training procedures. Thus it can be used prior to training as a rough estimate of the final privacy leakage. We also probe the limitations of our heuristic by providing some artificial counterexamples where it underestimates the privacy leakage. The standard composition-based privacy analysis of DP-SGD effectively assumes that the adversary has access to all intermediate iterates, which is often unrealistic. However, this analysis remains the state of the art in practice. While our heuristic does not replace a rigorous privacy analysis, it illustrates the large gap between the best theoretical upper bounds and the privacy auditing lower bounds and sets a target for further work to improve the theoretical privacy analyses. We also empirically support our heuristic and show existing privacy auditing attacks are bounded by our heuristic analysis in both vision and language tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 265
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2019Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership Inferencecited by 168
18 more
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
- 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 71
- 2023Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regressioncited by 61
- 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 60
- 2022Differentially Private Learning Needs Hidden State (Or Much Faster Convergence)cited by 45
- 2022Composition of Differential Privacy & Privacy Amplification by Subsamplingcited by 42
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
- 2018Detecting Violations of Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2022Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled Adversarial Queriescited by 36
- 2023One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated Learningcited by 35
- 2024Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleadingcited by 35
- 2022Bayesian Estimation of Differential Privacycited by 31
- 2024Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2024Tighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat Modelcited by 17
- 2024Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacycited by 10
- 2024It's Our Loss: No Privacy Amplification for Hidden State DP-SGD With Non-Convex Losscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7.
10 papers.
- 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Runcited by 28
- 2024To Shuffle or not to Shuffle: Auditing DP-SGD with Shufflingcited by 6
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descentcited by 6
- 2025Enhancing One-run Privacy Auditing with Quantile Regression-Based Membership Inferencecited by 4
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditingcited by 4
- 2025Empirical Privacy Variancecited by 3
- 2025MCMC for Bayesian estimation of Differential Privacy from Membership Inference Attackscited by 1
- 2024Adversarial Sample-Based Approach for Tighter Privacy Auditing in Final Model-Only Scenarioscited by 0
- 2025Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden Statescited by 0
- 2025Observational Auditing of Label Privacycited by 0
- 2025Observational Auditing of Label Privacy18 Nov 2025
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent21 Jul 2025
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditing20 Jun 2025
- 2025Enhancing One-run Privacy Auditing with Quantile Regression-Based Membership Inference18 Jun 2025
- 2025Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden States30 May 2025
- 2025MCMC for Bayesian estimation of Differential Privacy from Membership Inference Attacks23 Apr 2025
- 2025Empirical Privacy Variance16 Mar 2025
- 2024Adversarial Sample-Based Approach for Tighter Privacy Auditing in Final Model-Only Scenarios2 Dec 2024
- 2024To Shuffle or not to Shuffle: Auditing DP-SGD with Shuffling15 Nov 2024
- 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Run29 Oct 2024