mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

It's Our Loss: No Privacy Amplification for Hidden State DP-SGD With Non-Convex Loss

arXiv 2407.06496 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a popular iterative algorithm used to train machine learning models while formally guaranteeing the privacy of users. However, the privacy analysis of DP-SGD makes the unrealistic assumption that all intermediate iterates (aka internal state) of the algorithm are released since, in practice, only the final trained model, i.e., the final iterate of the algorithm is released. In this hidden state setting, prior work has provided tighter analyses, albeit only when the loss function is constrained, e.g., strongly convex and smooth or linear. On the other hand, the privacy leakage observed empirically from hidden state DP-SGD, even when using non-convex loss functions, suggests that there is in fact a gap between the theoretical privacy analysis and the privacy guarantees achieved in practice. Therefore, it remains an open question whether hidden state privacy amplification for DP-SGD is possible for all (possibly non-convex) loss functions in general. In this work, we design a counter-example and show, both theoretically and empirically, that a hidden state privacy amplification result for DP-SGD for all loss functions in general is not possible. By carefully constructing a loss function for DP-SGD, we show that for specific loss functions, the final iterate of DP-SGD alone leaks as much information as the sequence of all iterates combined. Furthermore, we empirically verify this result by evaluating the privacy leakage from the final iterate of DP-SGD with our loss function and show that this exactly matches the theoretical upper bound guaranteed by DP. Therefore, we show that the current privacy analysis for DP-SGD is tight for general loss functions and conclude that no privacy amplification is possible for DP-SGD in general for all (possibly non-convex) loss functions.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.

Builds on

12 of 23 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  4. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  5. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  6. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
  7. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
  8. 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
  9. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
  10. 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 73
  11. 2024Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 21
  12. 2024Tighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat Modelcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4.

10 papers.