It's Our Loss: No Privacy Amplification for Hidden State DP-SGD With Non-Convex Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a popular iterative algorithm used to train machine learning models while formally guaranteeing the privacy of users. However, the privacy analysis of DP-SGD makes the unrealistic assumption that all intermediate iterates (aka internal state) of the algorithm are released since, in practice, only the final trained model, i.e., the final iterate of the algorithm is released. In this hidden state setting, prior work has provided tighter analyses, albeit only when the loss function is constrained, e.g., strongly convex and smooth or linear. On the other hand, the privacy leakage observed empirically from hidden state DP-SGD, even when using non-convex loss functions, suggests that there is in fact a gap between the theoretical privacy analysis and the privacy guarantees achieved in practice. Therefore, it remains an open question whether hidden state privacy amplification for DP-SGD is possible for all (possibly non-convex) loss functions in general. In this work, we design a counter-example and show, both theoretically and empirically, that a hidden state privacy amplification result for DP-SGD for all loss functions in general is not possible. By carefully constructing a loss function for DP-SGD, we show that for specific loss functions, the final iterate of DP-SGD alone leaks as much information as the sequence of all iterates combined. Furthermore, we empirically verify this result by evaluating the privacy leakage from the final iterate of DP-SGD with our loss function and show that this exactly matches the theoretical upper bound guaranteed by DP. Therefore, we show that the current privacy analysis for DP-SGD is tight for general loss functions and conclude that no privacy amplification is possible for DP-SGD in general for all (possibly non-convex) loss functions.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
- 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 73
- 2024Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 21
- 2024Tighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat Modelcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4.
10 papers.
- 2024Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsamplingcited by 16
- 2024Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGDcited by 14
- 2024The Last Iterate Advantage: Empirical Auditing and Principled Heuristic Analysis of Differentially Private SGDcited by 11
- 2024Convergent Privacy Loss of Noisy-SGD without Convexity and Smoothnesscited by 8
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descentcited by 6
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditingcited by 5
- 2024On Using Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning with Multiple Local Stepscited by 1
- 2024Adversarial Sample-Based Approach for Tighter Privacy Auditing in Final Model-Only Scenarioscited by 0
- 2025Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden Statescited by 0
- 2025Beyond Membership: Limitations of Add/Remove Adjacency in Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2025Beyond Membership: Limitations of Add/Remove Adjacency in Differential Privacy26 Nov 2025
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent21 Jul 2025
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditing20 Jun 2025
- 2025Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden States30 May 2025
- 2024Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGD21 Dec 2024
- 2024Adversarial Sample-Based Approach for Tighter Privacy Auditing in Final Model-Only Scenarios2 Dec 2024
- 2024Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling6 Nov 2024
- 2024The Last Iterate Advantage: Empirical Auditing and Principled Heuristic Analysis of Differentially Private SGD8 Oct 2024
- 2024Convergent Privacy Loss of Noisy-SGD without Convexity and Smoothness1 Oct 2024
- 2024On Using Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning with Multiple Local Steps27 Jul 2024