Thompson Sampling For Combinatorial Bandits: Polynomial Regret and Mismatched Sampling Paradox
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider Thompson Sampling (TS) for linear combinatorial semi-bandits and subgaussian rewards. We propose the first known TS whose finite-time regret does not scale exponentially with the dimension of the problem. We further show the "mismatched sampling paradox": A learner who knows the rewards distributions and samples from the correct posterior distribution can perform exponentially worse than a learner who does not know the rewards and simply samples from a well-chosen Gaussian posterior. The code used to generate the experiments is available at https://github.com/RaymZhang/CTS-Mismatched-Paradox
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
- 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 41
- 2015Optimal Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problem with Multiple Playscited by 38
- 2020Statistical Efficiency of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 31
- 2016Combinatorial semi-bandit with known covariancecited by 24
- 2020Statistically Efficient, Polynomial Time Algorithms for Combinatorial Semi Banditscited by 11
- 2023When Combinatorial Thompson Sampling meets Approximation Regretcited by 6
- 2021On the Suboptimality of Thompson Sampling in High Dimensionscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.