mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Thompson Sampling For Combinatorial Bandits: Polynomial Regret and Mismatched Sampling Paradox

arXiv 2410.05441 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider Thompson Sampling (TS) for linear combinatorial semi-bandits and subgaussian rewards. We propose the first known TS whose finite-time regret does not scale exponentially with the dimension of the problem. We further show the "mismatched sampling paradox": A learner who knows the rewards distributions and samples from the correct posterior distribution can perform exponentially worse than a learner who does not know the rewards and simply samples from a well-chosen Gaussian posterior. The code used to generate the experiments is available at https://github.com/RaymZhang/CTS-Mismatched-Paradox

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
  2. 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
  3. 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 41
  4. 2015Optimal Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problem with Multiple Playscited by 38
  5. 2020Statistical Efficiency of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 31
  6. 2016Combinatorial semi-bandit with known covariancecited by 24
  7. 2020Statistically Efficient, Polynomial Time Algorithms for Combinatorial Semi Banditscited by 11
  8. 2023When Combinatorial Thompson Sampling meets Approximation Regretcited by 6
  9. 2021On the Suboptimality of Thompson Sampling in High Dimensionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.