mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Output Scouting: Auditing Large Language Models for Catastrophic Responses

arXiv 2410.05305 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent high profile incidents in which the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) resulted in significant harm to individuals have brought about a growing interest in AI safety. One reason LLM safety issues occur is that models often have at least some non-zero probability of producing harmful outputs. In this work, we explore the following scenario: imagine an AI safety auditor is searching for catastrophic responses from an LLM (e.g. a "yes" responses to "can I fire an employee for being pregnant?"), and is able to query the model a limited number times (e.g. 1000 times). What is a strategy for querying the model that would efficiently find those failure responses? To this end, we propose output scouting: an approach that aims to generate semantically fluent outputs to a given prompt matching any target probability distribution. We then run experiments using two LLMs and find numerous examples of catastrophic responses. We conclude with a discussion that includes advice for practitioners who are looking to implement LLM auditing for catastrophic responses. We also release an open-source toolkit (https://github.com/joaopfonseca/outputscouting) that implements our auditing framework using the Hugging Face transformers library.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  4. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  5. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  6. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  7. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  8. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  9. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
  10. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  11. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
  12. 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
10 more
  1. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 224
  2. 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 182
  3. 2024(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advicecited by 61
  4. 2024PRP: Propagating Universal Perturbations to Attack Large Language Model Guard-Railscited by 49
  5. 2022Learning to Estimate Shapley Values with Vision Transformerscited by 44
  6. 2023PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 42
  7. 2021Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 31
  8. 2024BELLS: A Framework Towards Future Proof Benchmarks for the Evaluation of LLM Safeguardscited by 13
  9. 2024Uncertainty-Guided Likelihood Tree Searchcited by 4
  10. 2024ShaRP: Explaining Rankings and Preferences with Shapley Valuescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.