mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Gradient Boosting Decision Trees on Medical Diagnosis over Tabular Data

arXiv 2410.03705 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2024cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical diagnosis is a crucial task in the medical field, in terms of providing accurate classification and respective treatments. Having near-precise decisions based on correct diagnosis can affect a patient's life itself, and may extremely result in a catastrophe if not classified correctly. Several traditional machine learning (ML), such as support vector machines (SVMs) and logistic regression, and state-of-the-art tabular deep learning (DL) methods, including TabNet and TabTransformer, have been proposed and used over tabular medical datasets. Additionally, due to the superior performances, lower computational costs, and easier optimization over different tasks, ensemble methods have been used in the field more recently. They offer a powerful alternative in terms of providing successful medical decision-making processes in several diagnosis tasks. In this study, we investigated the benefits of ensemble methods, especially the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithms in medical classification tasks over tabular data, focusing on XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM. The experiments demonstrate that GBDT methods outperform traditional ML and deep neural network architectures and have the highest average rank over several benchmark tabular medical diagnosis datasets. Furthermore, they require much less computational power compared to DL models, creating the optimal methodology in terms of high performance and lower complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

Builds on

12 of 65 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  5. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
  6. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  7. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
  8. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
  9. 2024The Ethics of ChatGPT in Medicine and Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 45
  10. 2022Transformers in Medical Image Analysis: A Reviewcited by 41
  11. 2024Can LLMs Correct Physicians, Yet? Investigating Effective Interaction Methods in the Medical Domaincited by 7
  12. 2022Deep Learning vs. Gradient Boosting: Benchmarking state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for credit scoringcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.