mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discovering Biases in Information Retrieval Models Using Relevance Thesaurus as Global Explanation

arXiv 2410.03584 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2024cs.IRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most efforts in interpreting neural relevance models have focused on local explanations, which explain the relevance of a document to a query but are not useful in predicting the model's behavior on unseen query-document pairs. We propose a novel method to globally explain neural relevance models by constructing a "relevance thesaurus" containing semantically relevant query and document term pairs. This thesaurus is used to augment lexical matching models such as BM25 to approximate the neural model's predictions. Our method involves training a neural relevance model to score the relevance of partial query and document segments, which is then used to identify relevant terms across the vocabulary space. We evaluate the obtained thesaurus explanation based on ranking effectiveness and fidelity to the target neural ranking model. Notably, our thesaurus reveals the existence of brand name bias in ranking models, demonstrating one advantage of our explanation method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.