MARE: Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor on Unsupervised Rationale Extraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unsupervised rationale extraction aims to extract text snippets to support model predictions without explicit rationale annotation. Researchers have made many efforts to solve this task. Previous works often encode each aspect independently, which may limit their ability to capture meaningful internal correlations between aspects. While there has been significant work on mitigating spurious correlations, our approach focuses on leveraging the beneficial internal correlations to improve multi-aspect rationale extraction. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor (MARE) to explain and predict multiple aspects simultaneously. Concretely, we propose a Multi-Aspect Multi-Head Attention (MAMHA) mechanism based on hard deletion to encode multiple text chunks simultaneously. Furthermore, multiple special tokens are prepended in front of the text with each corresponding to one certain aspect. Finally, multi-task training is deployed to reduce the training overhead. Experimental results on two unsupervised rationale extraction benchmarks show that MARE achieves state-of-the-art performance. Ablation studies further demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our codes have been available at https://github.com/CSU-NLP-Group/MARE.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 25 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
- 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
- 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
- 2018Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationalescited by 54
- 2021Understanding Interlocking Dynamics of Cooperative Rationalizationcited by 36
- 2019A Game Theoretic Approach to Class-wise Selective Rationalizationcited by 32
- 2023D-Separation for Causal Self-Explanationcited by 21
5 more
- 2022FR: Folded Rationalization with a Unified Encodercited by 18
- 2023Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalizationcited by 15
- 2021Distribution Matching for Rationalizationcited by 14
- 2023Decoupled Rationalization with Asymmetric Learning Rates: A Flexible Lipschitz Restraintcited by 14
- 2023You Only Forward Once: Prediction and Rationalization in A Single Forward Passcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-Rationalizationcited by 11
- 2025B-cos LM: Efficiently Transforming Pre-trained Language Models for Improved Explainabilitycited by 4
- 2025Learnable Game-theoretic Policy Optimization for Data-centric Self-explanation Rationalizationcited by 1
- 2026Learn from A Rationalist: Distilling Intermediate Interpretable Rationalescited by 0
- 2026Learn from A Rationalist: Distilling Intermediate Interpretable Rationales30 Jan 2026
- 2025Learnable Game-theoretic Policy Optimization for Data-centric Self-explanation Rationalization15 Oct 2025
- 2025B-cos LM: Efficiently Transforming Pre-trained Language Models for Improved Explainability18 Feb 2025
- 2024Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-Rationalization8 Oct 2024