mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Benefit of Being Bayesian in Online Conformal Prediction

arXiv 2410.02561 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Based on the framework of Conformal Prediction (CP), we study the online construction of confidence sets given a black-box machine learning model. By converting the target confidence levels into quantile levels, the problem can be reduced to predicting the quantiles (in hindsight) of a sequentially revealed data sequence. Two very different approaches have been studied previously: (i) Assuming the data sequence is iid or exchangeable, one could maintain the empirical distribution of the observed data as an algorithmic belief, and directly predict its quantiles. (ii) Due to the fragility of statistical assumptions, a recent trend is to consider the non-distributional, adversarial setting and apply first-order online optimization algorithms to moving quantile losses. However, it requires the oracle knowledge of the target quantile level, and suffers from a previously overlooked monotonicity issue due to the associated loss linearization. This paper presents an adaptive CP algorithm that combines their strengths. Without any statistical assumption, it is able to answer multiple arbitrary confidence level queries with low regret, while also overcoming the monotonicity issue suffered by first-order optimization baselines. Furthermore, if the data sequence is actually iid, then the same algorithm is automatically equipped with the "correct" coverage probability guarantee. To achieve such strengths, our key technical innovation is to regularize the aforementioned algorithmic belief (the empirical distribution) by a Bayesian prior, which robustifies it by simulating a non-linearized Follow the Regularized Leader (FTRL) algorithm on the output. Such a belief update backbone is shared by prediction heads targeting different confidence levels, bringing practical benefits analogous to the recently proposed concept of U-calibration (Kleinberg et al., 2023).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 32 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  2. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  3. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
  4. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 375
  5. 2022Conformal Inference for Online Prediction with Arbitrary Distribution Shiftscited by 128
  6. 2023Improved Online Conformal Prediction via Strongly Adaptive Online Learningcited by 78
  7. 2022Practical Adversarial Multivalid Conformal Predictioncited by 65
  8. 2024Online conformal prediction with decaying step sizescited by 56
  9. 2023U-Calibration: Forecasting for an Unknown Agentcited by 46
  10. 2023High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 41
  11. 2021Conformal Bayesian Computationcited by 39
  12. 2023Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 37
3 more
  1. 2023Bayesian Design Principles for Frequentist Sequential Learningcited by 18
  2. 2024Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and Beyondcited by 13
  3. 2024Discounted Adaptive Online Learning: Towards Better Regularizationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.