Stochastic variance-reduced Gaussian variational inference on the Bures-Wasserstein manifold
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimization in the Bures-Wasserstein space has been gaining popularity in the machine learning community since it draws connections between variational inference and Wasserstein gradient flows. The variational inference objective function of Kullback-Leibler divergence can be written as the sum of the negative entropy and the potential energy, making forward-backward Euler the method of choice. Notably, the backward step admits a closed-form solution in this case, facilitating the practicality of the scheme. However, the forward step is not exact since the Bures-Wasserstein gradient of the potential energy involves "intractable" expectations. Recent approaches propose using the Monte Carlo method -- in practice a single-sample estimator -- to approximate these terms, resulting in high variance and poor performance. We propose a novel variance-reduced estimator based on the principle of control variates. We theoretically show that this estimator has a smaller variance than the Monte-Carlo estimator in scenarios of interest. We also prove that variance reduction helps improve the optimization bounds of the current analysis. We demonstrate that the proposed estimator gains order-of-magnitude improvements over the previous Bures-Wasserstein methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.
Builds on
21 of 46 references.
References · 21
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 401
- 2013Black Box Variational Inferencecited by 317
- 2016Automatic Differentiation Variational Inferencecited by 159
- 2018Sampling as optimization in the space of measures: The Langevin dynamics as a composite optimization problemcited by 123
- 2017Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inferencecited by 97
- 2022Variational inference via Wasserstein gradient flowscited by 84
- 2021Large-Scale Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 76
- 2024Statistical optimal transportcited by 44
- 2023Forward-backward Gaussian variational inference via JKO in the Bures-Wasserstein Spacecited by 36
- 2021Averaging on the Bures-Wasserstein manifold: dimension-free convergence of gradient descentcited by 32
9 more
- 2023Provable convergence guarantees for black-box variational inferencecited by 29
- 2018Quasi-Monte Carlo Variational Inferencecited by 24
- 2019Stein's Lemma for the Reparameterization Trick with Exponential Family Mixturescited by 18
- 2023Variational Inference with Gaussian Score Matchingcited by 17
- 2018Gaussian variational approximation for high-dimensional state space modelscited by 10
- 2021The computational asymptotics of Gaussian variational inference and the Laplace approximationcited by 8
- 2023Bridging the Gap Between Variational Inference and Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 8
- 2023Practical and Matching Gradient Variance Bounds for Black-Box Variational Bayesian Inferencecited by 6
- 2024Non-geodesically-convex optimization in the Wasserstein spacecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.