mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correlation and Navigation in the Vocabulary Key Representation Space of Language Models

arXiv 2410.02284 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model (LM) decoding is based on the next-token prediction (NTP) probability distribution. For neural LMs (e.g., Transformer-based), NTP distribution is essentially a softmax-regularized dot product between an encoded input context (query) and fixed vocabulary representations (keys). In this paper, we study the effect of the key distribution on the NTP distribution, with a focus on whether the similarity between keys will trigger spurious correlations in NTP. Through knowledge-probing tasks, we show that in the NTP distribution, the few top-ranked tokens are typically accurate. However, the middle-ranked prediction is highly biased towards the tokens that are distributionally (not necessarily semantically) similar to these top ones. For instance, if "P" is predicted as the top-1 token, "A"-"Z" will all be ranked high in NTP, no matter whether they can lead to correct decoding results. This hurts the sampling diversity and makes the sampling of correct, long-tail results hopeless and noisy. We attempt to alleviate this issue via a novel in-context method that iteratively pushes the query representation away from explored regions. Specifically, we include the explored decoding results in the context and prompt the LM to generate something else, which encourages the LM to produce a query representation that has small dot products with explored keys. Experiments on knowledge-probing tasks show that our method leads to efficient navigation away from explored keys to correct new keys. We further extend our method to open-ended and chain-of-thought (for reasoning) generation. Experiment results show that ICN contributes to better generation diversity and improved self-consistency voting performance. Finally, we discuss potential training issues caused by the fixed key space together with the challenges and possible ways to address them in future research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  7. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  8. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  9. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  10. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  11. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  12. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
16 more
  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  2. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  3. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  4. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  5. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 211
  6. 2024Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Promptingcited by 210
  7. 2022A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Basescited by 157
  8. 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 137
  9. 2023Word Embeddings Are Steers for Language Modelscited by 70
  10. 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
  11. 2024Answer is All You Need: Instruction-following Text Embedding via Answering the Questioncited by 27
  12. 2020Empower Entity Set Expansion via Language Model Probingcited by 25
  13. 2022BertNet: Harvesting Knowledge Graphs with Arbitrary Relations from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 20
  14. 2024Crafting Interpretable Embeddings by Asking LLMs Questionscited by 11
  15. 2024Retrieval is Accurate Generationcited by 10
  16. 2024Incubating Text Classifiers Following User Instruction with Nothing but LLMcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs
  2. 2026Divergent large language model predictions from convergent representations in ambiguous word pairs
  3. 2025Rethinking the Understanding Ability across LLMs through Mutual Information
  4. 2026Improving Diffusion Language Model Decoding through Joint Search in Generation Order and Token Space
  5. 2026Beyond Tokens: A Survey on Decoding Methods for Large Language and Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Entropy Guided Extrapolative Decoding to Improve Factuality in Large Language Models
  7. 2025How Language Directions Align with Token Geometry in Multilingual LLMs
  8. 2024FIRP: Faster LLM inference via future intermediate representation prediction