Realizable Continuous-Space Shields for Safe Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success across various domains, it remains vulnerable to occasional catastrophic failures without additional safeguards. An effective solution to prevent these failures is to use a shield that validates and adjusts the agent's actions to ensure compliance with a provided set of safety specifications. For real-world robotic domains, it is essential to define safety specifications over continuous state and action spaces to accurately account for system dynamics and compute new actions that minimally deviate from the agent's original decision. In this paper, we present the first shielding approach specifically designed to ensure the satisfaction of safety requirements in continuous state and action spaces, making it suitable for practical robotic applications. Our method builds upon realizability, an essential property that confirms the shield will always be able to generate a safe action for any state in the environment. We formally prove that realizability can be verified for stateful shields, enabling the incorporation of non-Markovian safety requirements, such as loop avoidance. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in ensuring safety without compromising the policy's success rate by applying it to a navigation problem and a multi-agent particle environment.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
26 of 41 references.
References · 26
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 224
- 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2019IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraintscited by 119
14 more
- 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 109
- 2017Virtual-to-real Deep Reinforcement Learning: Continuous Control of Mobile Robots for Mapless Navigationcited by 90
- 2023Safe Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Logic Shieldscited by 41
- 2022Verifying Learning-Based Robotic Navigation Systemscited by 33
- 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning using Formal Verification for Tissue Retraction in Autonomous Robotic-Assisted Surgerycited by 22
- 2023AutoCost: Evolving Intrinsic Cost for Zero-violation Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2024Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2022Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Robotics via Scenario-Based Programmingcited by 11
- 2023Controlling the Solo12 Quadruped Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2023Boolean Abstractions for Realizability Modulo Theories (Extended version)cited by 9
- 2024Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2017Validity-Guided Synthesis of Reactive Systems from Assume-Guarantee Contractscited by 6
- 2023Decidable Fragments of LTLf Modulo Theories (Extended Version)cited by 5
- 2024Predictable and Performant Reactive Synthesis Modulo Theories via Functional Synthesiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.