mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Examining the Role of Relationship Alignment in Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.01708 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid development and deployment of Generative AI in social settings raise important questions about how to optimally personalize them for users while maintaining accuracy and realism. Based on a Facebook public post-comment dataset, this study evaluates the ability of Llama 3.0 (70B) to predict the semantic tones across different combinations of a commenter's and poster's gender, age, and friendship closeness and to replicate these differences in LLM-generated comments. The study consists of two parts: Part I assesses differences in semantic tones across social relationship categories, and Part II examines the similarity between comments generated by Llama 3.0 (70B) and human comments from Part I given public Facebook posts as input. Part I results show that including social relationship information improves the ability of a model to predict the semantic tone of human comments. However, Part II results show that even without including social context information in the prompt, LLM-generated comments and human comments are equally sensitive to social context, suggesting that LLMs can comprehend semantics from the original post alone. When we include all social relationship information in the prompt, the similarity between human comments and LLM-generated comments decreases. This inconsistency may occur because LLMs did not include social context information as part of their training data. Together these results demonstrate the ability of LLMs to comprehend semantics from the original post and respond similarly to human comments, but also highlights their limitations in generalizing personalized comments through prompting alone.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  4. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  5. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  6. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  7. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
  8. 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 335
  9. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  10. 2016A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Modelcited by 221
  11. 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 203
  12. 2022BlenderBot 3: a deployed conversational agent that continually learns to responsibly engagecited by 197
10 more
  1. 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 177
  2. 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 161
  3. 2023NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Normscited by 60
  4. 2020Towards Persona-Based Empathetic Conversational Modelscited by 53
  5. 2022Identifying and Manipulating the Personality Traits of Language Modelscited by 40
  6. 2023Align on the Fly: Adapting Chatbot Behavior to Established Normscited by 22
  7. 2024Proxona: Supporting Creators' Sensemaking and Ideation with LLM-Powered Audience Personascited by 19
  8. 2023P5: Plug-and-Play Persona Prompting for Personalized Response Selectioncited by 8
  9. 2024Role-Play Zero-Shot Prompting with Large Language Models for Open-Domain Human-Machine Conversationcited by 7
  10. 2016Probabilistic Inference of Twitter Users' Age based on What They Followcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EUDAIMONIA: Evaluating Undesirable Dynamics in AI
  2. 2026One Model Is Not a Crowd: Multi-LLM and Aspect-Conditioned Diverse Comment Generation
  3. 2025Evaluating Human-LLM Representation Alignment: A Case Study on Affective Sentence Generation for Augmentative and Alternative Communication
  4. 2026PIVOTSBench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Interpersonal Relationship Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2023Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmark
  6. 2026ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media ↗
  7. 2026Modeling Community Attitude through Reaction Tone: A Human-AI Collaborative Framework for Evaluating LLM Alignment with Linguistic Behaviors in Online Communities
  8. 2024SOCIALITE-LLAMA: An Instruction-Tuned Model for Social Scientific Tasks