Investigating the Impact of Model Complexity in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) based on the pre-trained fine-tuning paradigm have become pivotal in solving natural language processing tasks, consistently achieving state-of-the-art performance. Nevertheless, the theoretical understanding of how model complexity influences fine-tuning performance remains challenging and has not been well explored yet. In this paper, we focus on autoregressive LLMs and propose to employ Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to model them. Based on the HMM modeling, we investigate the relationship between model complexity and the generalization capability in downstream tasks. Specifically, we consider a popular tuning paradigm for downstream tasks, head tuning, where all pre-trained parameters are frozen and only individual heads are trained atop pre-trained LLMs. Our theoretical analysis reveals that the risk initially increases and then decreases with rising model complexity, showcasing a "double descent" phenomenon. In this case, the initial "descent" is degenerate, signifying that the "sweet spot" where bias and variance are balanced occurs when the model size is zero. Obtaining the presented in this study conclusion confronts several challenges, primarily revolving around effectively modeling autoregressive LLMs and downstream tasks, as well as conducting a comprehensive risk analysis for multivariate regression. Our research is substantiated by experiments conducted on data generated from HMMs, which provided empirical support and alignment with our theoretical insights.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2024.
Builds on
40 of 48 references.
References · 40
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
28 more
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
- 2023Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 293
- 2023Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selectioncited by 291
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
- 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
- 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
- 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
- 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
- 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
- 2022Modality Competition: What Makes Joint Training of Multi-modal Network Fail in Deep Learning? (Provably)cited by 115
- 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 97
- 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
- 2021Why Do Pretrained Language Models Help in Downstream Tasks? An Analysis of Head and Prompt Tuningcited by 82
- 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 76
- 2022Inverse scaling can become U-shapedcited by 76
- 2020A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Taskscited by 71
- 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
- 2020Asymptotics of Ridge (less) Regression under General Source Conditioncited by 61
- 2020Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regretcited by 57
- 2020Contrastive estimation reveals topic posterior information to linear modelscited by 54
- 2020Multiple Descent: Design Your Own Generalization Curvecited by 44
- 2020The Curious Case of Adversarially Robust Models: More Data Can Help, Double Descend, or Hurt Generalizationcited by 39
- 2020More Data Can Expand the Generalization Gap Between Adversarially Robust and Standard Modelscited by 27
- 2020Scaling Hidden Markov Language Modelscited by 22
- 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.