Uncovering Differences in Persuasive Language in Russian versus English Wikipedia
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study how differences in persuasive language across Wikipedia articles, written in either English and Russian, can uncover each culture's distinct perspective on different subjects. We develop a large language model (LLM) powered system to identify instances of persuasive language in multilingual texts. Instead of directly prompting LLMs to detect persuasion, which is subjective and difficult, we propose to reframe the task to instead ask high-level questions (HLQs) which capture different persuasive aspects. Importantly, these HLQs are authored by LLMs themselves. LLMs over-generate a large set of HLQs, which are subsequently filtered to a small set aligned with human labels for the original task. We then apply our approach to a large-scale, bilingual dataset of Wikipedia articles (88K total), using a two-stage identify-then-extract prompting strategy to find instances of persuasion. We quantify the amount of persuasion per article, and explore the differences in persuasion through several experiments on the paired articles. Notably, we generate rankings of articles by persuasion in both languages. These rankings match our intuitions on the culturally-salient subjects; Russian Wikipedia highlights subjects on Ukraine, while English Wikipedia highlights the Middle East. Grouping subjects into larger topics, we find politically-related events contain more persuasion than others. We further demonstrate that HLQs obtain similar performance when posed in either English or Russian. Our methodology enables cross-lingual, cross-cultural understanding at scale, and we release our code, prompts, and data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 530
- 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 293
- 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
- 2023Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 118
- 2022Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learnerscited by 48
- 2023This Land is {Your, My} Land: Evaluating Geopolitical Biases in Language Modelscited by 32
- 2022Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukrainecited by 15
- 2020What is Trending on Wikipedia? Capturing Trends and Language Biases Across Wikipedia Editionscited by 4
- 2013The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation for Culturally-Sensitive Tasks: A Benchmark for Cross-lingual Robustnesscited by 14
- 2026Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategiescited by 3
- 2026CultureMINE: Datasets and Methods for Improving the Cultural Capabilities of NLP Systemscited by 0
- 2026CultureMINE: Datasets and Methods for Improving the Cultural Capabilities of NLP Systems18 Sep 2026
- 2026Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategies15 Jan 2026
- 2024Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation for Culturally-Sensitive Tasks: A Benchmark for Cross-lingual Robustness2 Oct 2024