Implementing NLPs in industrial process modeling: Addressing Categorical Variables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Important variables of processes are often categorical, i.e. names or labels representing, e.g. categories of inputs, or types of reactors or a sequence of steps. In this work, we use Natural Language Processing Models to derive embeddings of such inputs that represent their actual meaning, or reflect the "distances" between categories, i.e. how similar or dissimilar they are. This is a marked difference from the current standard practice of using binary, or one-hot encoding to replace categorical variables with sequences of ones and zeros. Combined with dimensionality reduction techniques, either linear such as Principal Component Analysis, or nonlinear such as Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection, the proposed approach leads to a meaningful, low-dimensional feature space. The significance of obtaining meaningful embeddings is illustrated in the context of an industrial coating process for cutting tools that includes both numerical and categorical inputs. In this industrial process, subject matter expertise suggests that the categorical inputs are critical for determining the final outcome but this cannot be taken into account with the current state-of-the-art. The proposed approach enables feature importance which is a marked improvement compared to the current state-of-the-art in the encoding of categorical variables. The proposed approach is not limited to the case-study presented here and is suitable for applications with similar mix of categorical and numerical critical inputs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.
Builds on
21 of 65 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
- 2022Talking About Large Language Modelscited by 174
9 more
- 2022Analyzing Transformers in Embedding Spacecited by 131
- 2024Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?cited by 89
- 2016An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generationcited by 48
- 2020The role of surrogate models in the development of digital twins of dynamic systemscited by 20
- 2021A Machine Learning Framework for Real-time Inverse Modeling and Multi-objective Process Optimization of Composites for Active Manufacturing Controlcited by 9
- 2018Model-Free Adaptive Optimal Control of Episodic Fixed-Horizon Manufacturing Processes using Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2023The Daunting Dilemma with Sentence Encoders: Success on Standard Benchmarks, Failure in Capturing Basic Semantic Propertiescited by 4
- 2021Evaluating Pretrained Transformer Models for Entity Linking in Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 3
- 2024Integrating supervised and unsupervised learning approaches to unveil critical process inputscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.