mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A physics-driven sensor placement optimization methodology for temperature field reconstruction

arXiv 2409.18423 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perceiving the global field from sparse sensors has been a grand challenge in the monitoring, analysis, and design of physical systems. In this context, sensor placement optimization is a crucial issue. Most existing works require large and sufficient data to construct data-based criteria, which are intractable in data-free scenarios without numerical and experimental data. To this end, we propose a novel physics-driven sensor placement optimization (PSPO) method for temperature field reconstruction using a physics-based criterion to optimize sensor locations. In our methodological framework, we firstly derive the theoretical upper and lower bounds of the reconstruction error under noise scenarios by analyzing the optimal solution, proving that error bounds correlate with the condition number determined by sensor locations. Furthermore, the condition number, as the physics-based criterion, is used to optimize sensor locations by the genetic algorithm. Finally, the best sensors are validated by reconstruction models, including non-invasive end-to-end models, non-invasive reduced-order models, and physics-informed models. Experimental results, both on a numerical and an application case, demonstrate that the PSPO method significantly outperforms random and uniform selection methods, improving the reconstruction accuracy by nearly an order of magnitude. Moreover, the PSPO method can achieve comparable reconstruction accuracy to the existing data-driven placement optimization methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.

Builds on

19 of 58 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2014Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networkscited by 331
  3. 2022Deep transfer operator learning for partial differential equations under conditional shiftcited by 83
  4. 2021POD-DL-ROM: enhancing deep learning-based reduced order models for nonlinear parametrized PDEs by proper orthogonal decompositioncited by 79
  5. 2017Data-Driven Sparse Sensor Placement for Reconstructioncited by 57
  6. 2021Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learningcited by 57
  7. 2021A novel meta-learning initialization method for physics-informed neural networkscited by 35
  8. 2020Multi-fidelity sensor selection: Greedy algorithms to place cheap and expensive sensors with cost constraintscited by 10
  9. 2021PySensors: A Python Package for Sparse Sensor Placementcited by 8
  10. 2021The Artificial Intelligence behind the winning entry to the 2019 AI Robotic Racing Competitioncited by 8
  11. 2022Temperature Field Inversion of Heat-Source Systems via Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 8
  12. 2018Greedy Sensor Placement with Cost Constraintscited by 5
7 more
  1. 2023Graph Neural Networks for Aerodynamic Flow Reconstruction from Sparse Sensingcited by 4
  2. 2020Data-driven sparse sensor placement based on A-optimal design of experiment with ADMMcited by 3
  3. 2019Exploiting Convexification for Bayesian Optimal Sensor Placement by Maximization of Mutual Informationcited by 2
  4. 2022Data-Driven Sensor Selection Method Based on Proximal Optimization for High-Dimensional Data With Correlated Measurement Noisecited by 2
  5. 2019Fast Greedy Optimization of Sensor Selection in Measurement with Correlated Noisecited by 1
  6. 2020On the use of recurrent neural networks for predictions of turbulent flowscited by 1
  7. 2022Randomized Group-Greedy Method for Large-Scale Sensor Selection Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.