Multi-fidelity sensor selection: Greedy algorithms to place cheap and expensive sensors with cost constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop greedy algorithms to approximate the optimal solution to the multi-fidelity sensor selection problem, which is a cost constrained optimization problem prescribing the placement and number of cheap (low signal-to-noise) and expensive (high signal-to-noise) sensors in an environment or state space. Specifically, we evaluate the composition of cheap and expensive sensors, along with their placement, required to achieve accurate reconstruction of a high-dimensional state. We use the column-pivoted QR decomposition to obtain preliminary sensor positions. How many of each type of sensor to use is highly dependent upon the sensor noise levels, sensor costs, overall cost budget, and the singular value spectrum of the data measured. Such nuances allow us to provide sensor selection recommendations based on computational results for asymptotic regions of parameter space. We also present a systematic exploration of the effects of the number of modes and sensors on reconstruction error when using one type of sensor. Our extensive exploration of multi-fidelity sensor composition as a function of data characteristics is the first of its kind to provide guidelines towards optimal multi-fidelity sensor selection.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021PySensors: A Python Package for Sparse Sensor Placementcited by 8
- 2023Constrained optimization of sensor placement for nuclear digital twinscited by 6
- 2021Active operator inference for learning low-dimensional dynamical-system models from noisy datacited by 5
- 2026Adaptive Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Data and Model Fusion of Complex Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 3
- 2022A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Sensing Design in Resource-Constrained Wireless Networked Control Systemscited by 2
- 2021Orthogonal Features Based EEG Signals Denoising Using Fractional and Compressed One-Dimensional CNN AutoEncodercited by 1
- 2022To Compute or not to Compute? Adaptive Smart Sensing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computingcited by 1
- 2024State Estimation Using Sparse DEIM and Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2024A physics-driven sensor placement optimization methodology for temperature field reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026Origins and mitigation of double descent in reduced order modelingcited by 0
- 2026Origins and mitigation of double descent in reduced order modeling29 Jul 2026
- 2026Adaptive Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Data and Model Fusion of Complex Nonlinear Dynamical Systems13 Mar 2026
- 2024State Estimation Using Sparse DEIM and Recurrent Neural Networks21 Oct 2024
- 2024A physics-driven sensor placement optimization methodology for temperature field reconstruction27 Sep 2024
- 2023Constrained optimization of sensor placement for nuclear digital twins23 Jun 2023
- 2022To Compute or not to Compute? Adaptive Smart Sensing in Resource-Constrained Edge Computing5 Sep 2022
- 2022A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Sensing Design in Resource-Constrained Wireless Networked Control Systems1 Apr 2022
- 2021Active operator inference for learning low-dimensional dynamical-system models from noisy data20 Jul 2021
- 2021Orthogonal Features Based EEG Signals Denoising Using Fractional and Compressed One-Dimensional CNN AutoEncoder16 Apr 2021
- 2021PySensors: A Python Package for Sparse Sensor Placement20 Feb 2021