mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VickreyFeedback: Cost-efficient Data Construction for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

arXiv 2409.18417 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the cost-efficiency aspect of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). RLHF leverages datasets of human preferences over outputs of large language models (LLM)s to instill human expectations into LLMs. Although preference annotation comes with a monetized cost, the economic utility of a preference dataset has not been considered by far. What exacerbates this situation is that, given complex intransitive or cyclic relationships in preference datasets, existing algorithms for fine-tuning LLMs are still far from capturing comprehensive preferences. This raises severe cost-efficiency concerns in production environments, where preference data accumulate over time. In this paper, we discuss the fine-tuning of LLMs as a monetized economy and introduce an auction mechanism to improve the efficiency of preference data collection in dollar terms. We show that introducing an auction mechanism can play an essential role in enhancing the cost-efficiency of RLHF, while maintaining satisfactory model performance. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed auction-based protocol is cost-effective for fine-tuning LLMs concentrating on high-quality feedback.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Comprehensive Preference Data Collection for Reward Modeling24 Jun
  2. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferences4 Apr
  3. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling11 Jan
  4. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO11 Jul
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr

Other references · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  5. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  6. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  7. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  8. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  9. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 407
  10. 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 263
  11. 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 183
  12. 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
10 more
  1. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimizationcited by 54
  2. 2022On the Sensitivity of Reward Inference to Misspecified Human Modelscited by 25
  3. 2024A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 24
  4. 2024A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregationcited by 23
  5. 2023Jellyfish: A Large Language Model for Data Preprocessingcited by 20
  6. 2024Disperse-Then-Merge: Pushing the Limits of Instruction Tuning via Alignment Tax Reductioncited by 18
  7. 2024Mechanism Design for LLM Fine-tuning with Multiple Reward Modelscited by 18
  8. 2024UNA: A Unified Supervised Framework for Efficient LLM Alignment Across Feedback Typescited by 6
  9. 2021Batch Reinforcement Learning from Crowdscited by 4
  10. 2024Maximizing User Experience with LLMOps-Driven Personalized Recommendation Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  2. 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
  3. 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF
  4. 2025Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback via Bayesian Preference Inference
  5. 2024Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  6. 2025Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  7. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
  8. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment