AI Delegates with a Dual Focus: Ensuring Privacy and Strategic Self-Disclosure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM)-based AI delegates are increasingly utilized to act on behalf of users, assisting them with a wide range of tasks through conversational interfaces. Despite their advantages, concerns arise regarding the potential risk of privacy leaks, particularly in scenarios involving social interactions. While existing research has focused on protecting privacy by limiting the access of AI delegates to sensitive user information, many social scenarios require disclosing private details to achieve desired social goals, necessitating a balance between privacy protection and disclosure. To address this challenge, we first conduct a pilot study to investigate user perceptions of AI delegates across various social relations and task scenarios, and then propose a novel AI delegate system that enables privacy-conscious self-disclosure. Our user study demonstrates that the proposed AI delegate strategically protects privacy, pioneering its use in diverse and dynamic social interactions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.
Builds on
30 of 71 references.
References · 30
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 692
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
- 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 553
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
- 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 314
- 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 257
18 more
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 194
- 2024UFO: A UI-Focused Agent for Windows OS Interactioncited by 147
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 129
- 2023Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generationcited by 94
- 2023Conversational Health Agents: A Personalized LLM-Powered Agent Frameworkcited by 91
- 2023TaskWeaver: A Code-First Agent Frameworkcited by 85
- 2023DP-OPT: Make Large Language Model Your Privacy-Preserving Prompt Engineercited by 56
- 2023Privacy-Preserving Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Language Model Servicescited by 43
- 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 43
- 2023Empower Large Language Model to Perform Better on Industrial Domain-Specific Question Answeringcited by 41
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debatecited by 40
- 2022Privately Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 39
- 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistantscited by 36
- 2023How Trustworthy are Open-Source LLMs? An Assessment under Malicious Demonstrations Shows their Vulnerabilitiescited by 33
- 2023An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviorscited by 18
- 2023A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding User Trust after Voice Assistant Failurescited by 11
- 2024The Vision of Autonomic Computing: Can LLMs Make It a Reality?cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.