mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications

arXiv 2409.16872 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The popularisation of applying AI in businesses poses significant challenges relating to ethical principles, governance, and legal compliance. Although businesses have embedded AI into their day-to-day processes, they lack a unified approach for mitigating its potential risks. This paper introduces a framework ensuring that AI must be ethical, controllable, viable, and desirable. Balancing these factors ensures the design of a framework that addresses its trade-offs, such as balancing performance against explainability. A successful framework provides practical advice for businesses to meet regulatory requirements in sectors such as finance and healthcare, where it is critical to comply with standards like GPDR and the EU AI Act. Different case studies validate this framework by integrating AI in both academic and practical environments. For instance, large language models are cost-effective alternatives for generating synthetic opinions that emulate attitudes to environmental issues. These case studies demonstrate how having a structured framework could enhance transparency and maintain performance levels as shown from the alignment between synthetic and expected distributions. This alignment is quantified using metrics like Chi-test scores, normalized mutual information, and Jaccard indexes. Future research should explore the framework's empirical validation in diverse industrial settings further, ensuring the model's scalability and adaptability.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

Builds on

7 of 64 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  2. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 246
  4. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 149
  5. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 84
  6. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
  7. 2023Are Large Language Models a Threat to Digital Public Goods? Evidence from Activity on Stack Overflowcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.