AdapFair: Ensuring Adaptive Fairness for Machine Learning Operations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The biases and discrimination of machine learning algorithms have attracted significant attention, leading to the development of various algorithms tailored to specific contexts. However, these solutions often fall short of addressing fairness issues inherent in machine learning operations. In this paper, we present an adaptive debiasing framework designed to find an optimal fair transformation of input data that maximally preserves data predictability under dynamic conditions. A distinctive feature of our approach is its flexibility and efficiency. It can be integrated with pretrained black-box classifiers, providing fairness guarantees with minimal retraining efforts, even in the face of frequent data drifts, evolving fairness requirements, and batches of similar tasks. To achieve this, we leverage the normalizing flows to enable efficient, information-preserving data transformation, ensuring that no critical information is lost during the debiasing process. Additionally, we incorporate the Wasserstein distance as the fairness measure to guide the optimization of data transformations. Finally, we introduce an efficient optimization algorithm with closed-formed gradient computations, making our framework scalable and suitable for dynamic, real-world environments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.
Builds on
29 of 55 references.
References · 29
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 202
17 more
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
- 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2019Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Makingcited by 75
- 2018Differential Properties of Sinkhorn Approximation for Learning with Wasserstein Distancecited by 56
- 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
- 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
- 2021Fair Normalizing Flowscited by 38
- 2019Learning Fair Representations via an Adversarial Frameworkcited by 29
- 2023Efficient fair PCA for fair representation learningcited by 23
- 2022Optimal Transport of Classifiers to Fairnesscited by 12
- 2024A Unified Post-Processing Framework for Group Fairness in Classificationcited by 6
- 2020Augmenting Organizational Decision-Making with Deep Learning Algorithms: Principles, Promises, and Challengescited by 4
- 2017Matching Code and Law: Achieving Algorithmic Fairness with Optimal Transportcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.