Enhancing Scientific Reproducibility Through Automated BioCompute Object Creation Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Publications
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Medical and biomedical RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
The exponential growth in computational power and accessibility has transformed the complexity and scale of bioinformatics research, necessitating standardized documentation for transparency, reproducibility, and regulatory compliance. The IEEE BioCompute Object (BCO) standard addresses this need but faces adoption challenges due to the overhead of creating compliant documentation, especially for legacy research. This paper presents a novel approach to automate the creation of BCOs from scientific papers using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Large Language Models (LLMs). We describe the development of the BCO assistant tool that leverages RAG to extract relevant information from source papers and associated code repositories, addressing key challenges such as LLM hallucination and long-context understanding. The implementation incorporates optimized retrieval processes, including a two-pass retrieval with re-ranking, and employs carefully engineered prompts for each BCO domain. We discuss the tool's architecture, extensibility, and evaluation methods, including automated and manual assessment approaches. The BCO assistant demonstrates the potential to significantly reduce the time and effort required for retroactive documentation of bioinformatics research while maintaining compliance with the standard. This approach opens avenues for AI-assisted scientific documentation and knowledge extraction from publications thereby enhancing scientific reproducibility. The BCO assistant tool and documentation is available at https://biocompute-objects.github.io/bco-rag/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and biomedical RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
- 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 90
- 2024How Well Can a Long Sequence Model Model Long Sequences? Comparing Architechtural Inductive Biases on Long-Context Abilitiescited by 9
- 2024Misinforming LLMs: vulnerabilities, challenges and opportunitiescited by 3
- 2018A data-supported history of bioinformatics toolscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025On The Reproducibility Limitations of RAG Systems
- 2026VILLA: Versatile Information Retrieval From Scientific Literature Using Large LAnguage Models ↗
- 2026RCSB PDB AI Help Desk: retrieval-augmented generation for protein structure deposition support
- 2026Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics
- 2026Unlocking Biological Workflows for Robust Protein-Text Question Answering: A Dual-Dimensional RAG Framework
- 2025BioAgents: Democratizing Bioinformatics Analysis with Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assistant for Anatomical Pathology Laboratories
- 2026Bioinfoysis Technical Report