HUT: A More Computation Efficient Fine-Tuning Method With Hadamard Updated Transformation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning pre-trained language models for downstream tasks has achieved impressive results in NLP. However, fine-tuning all parameters becomes impractical due to the rapidly increasing size of model parameters. To address this, Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods update only a subset of parameters. Most PEFT methods, such as LoRA, use incremental updates, which involve adding learned weight matrix increments to the original parameters. Although effective, these methods face limitations in capturing complex parameter dynamics and do not maintain a strong correlation between the original and updated parameters. To overcome these challenges, we propose the direct Updated Transformation (UT) paradigm, which constructs a transformation directly from the original to the updated parameters. This approach ensures that the correlation between the original and updated parameters is preserved, leveraging the semantic features learned during pre-training. Building on this paradigm, we present the Hadamard Updated Transformation (HUT) method. HUT efficiently updates the original weight matrix using the Hadamard transformation with two low-rank matrices, offering a more expressive and flexible update mechanism. This allows HUT to capture richer parameter features through functional transformations, reducing computational complexity while maintaining or improving model quality. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on RoBERTa and GPT-2 validate the effectiveness of HUT. Results show that HUT performs on par with or better than other PEFT methods in terms of model quality, while significantly reducing computational complexity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
10 more
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 351
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 324
- 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 294
- 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
- 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 252
- 2020Exploring Versatile Generative Language Model Via Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 139
- 2022Efficient Fine-Tuning of BERT Models on the Edgecited by 29
Built on by
Not cited yet.