mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Skip Connection: Pooling and Unpooling Design for Elimination Singularities

arXiv 2409.13154 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) presents unique challenges, including the pervasive issue of elimination singularities, consistent deactivation of nodes leading to degenerate manifolds within the loss landscape. These singularities impede efficient learning by disrupting feature propagation. To mitigate this, we introduce Pool Skip, an architectural enhancement that strategically combines a Max Pooling, a Max Unpooling, a 3 times 3 convolution, and a skip connection. This configuration helps stabilize the training process and maintain feature integrity across layers. We also propose the Weight Inertia hypothesis, which underpins the development of Pool Skip, providing theoretical insights into mitigating degradation caused by elimination singularities through dimensional and affine compensation. We evaluate our method on a variety of benchmarks, focusing on both 2D natural and 3D medical imaging applications, including tasks such as classification and segmentation. Our findings highlight Pool Skip's effectiveness in facilitating more robust CNN training and improving model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  8. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  10. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  11. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  12. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
16 more
  1. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  2. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  3. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  4. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  5. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  6. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  7. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  8. 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
  9. 2016A guide to convolution arithmetic for deep learningcited by 182
  10. 2021Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategiescited by 158
  11. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and Futurecited by 104
  12. 2018Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapycited by 76
  13. 2023Learning to Upsample by Learning to Samplecited by 57
  14. 2020Pooling Methods in Deep Neural Networks, a Reviewcited by 52
  15. 2018Pooling is neither necessary nor sufficient for appropriate deformation stability in CNNscited by 8
  16. 2019Rethinking Normalization and Elimination Singularity in Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.