mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can we only use guideline instead of shot in prompt?

arXiv 2409.12979 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, prompting techniques can be mainly divided into two categories:1)shot method implicitly inspires the model to answer the question by mimicing the steps in the given example, e.g., the few-shot CoT. 2) Guideline method explicitly instructs the model to reason by following guidelines, which contains succinct and concise task-specific knowledge. Shot method is prone to difficulties in terms of selection of shots type, the number of shots, and the design of the reasoning steps, so a question arises: can we only use guideline instead of shot in the prompt? To this end, we propose the FGT framework to automatically learn task-specific guidelines from dataset consisting of Feedback, Guideline, and Tree-gather agents. First, the feedback agent is designed to evaluate the outcomes, both right and wrong, of each Q&A to gather insights guiding more effective optimization strategies. Next, the guideline agent is tasked with deriving guidelines from each piece of feedback and storing them in local memory. Lastly, the tree-gather agent aggregates all guidelines hierarchically through a tree structure, ultimately obtaining all unduplicated guidelines from a global perspective. In addition, we induce the model to generate intermediate processes to ensure the reasoning consistent with the guidelines. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance across multiple tasks, thereby highlighting the effectiveness of using the guidelines in prompt.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  8. 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 226
  9. 2024Faithful Logical Reasoning via Symbolic Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 99
  10. 2024In-Context Principle Learning from Mistakescited by 42
  11. 2024T-RAG: Lessons from the LLM Trenchescited by 23
  12. 2024Intent-based Prompt Calibration: Enhancing prompt optimization with synthetic boundary casescited by 13
1 more
  1. 2024AI2Apps: A Visual IDE for Building LLM-based AI Agent Applicationscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Automatically Evolving Prompt Guidelines for Task-Specific Optimization
  2. 2023Few-shot Unified Question Answering: Tuning Models or Prompts?
  3. 2026Diverge to Induce Prompting: Multi-Rationale Induction for Zero-Shot Reasoning
  4. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models
  5. 2023Leveraging Training Data in Few-Shot Prompting for Numerical Reasoning
  6. 2023StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving
  7. 2026Soft Guidance Starts to Outperform CoT Prompting as LLMs Improve
  8. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications