mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Few-shot Unified Question Answering: Tuning Models or Prompts?

arXiv 2305.14569 ↗First posted 23 May 2023cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Question-answering (QA) tasks often investigate specific question types, knowledge domains, or reasoning skills, leading to specialized models catering to specific categories of QA tasks. While recent research has explored the idea of unified QA models, such models are usually explored for high-resource scenarios and require re-training to extend their capabilities. To overcome these drawbacks, the paper explores the potential of two paradigms of tuning, model, and prompts, for unified QA under a low-resource setting. The paper provides an exhaustive analysis of their applicability using 16 QA datasets, revealing that prompt tuning can perform as well as model tuning in a few-shot setting with a good initialization. The study also shows that parameter-sharing results in superior few-shot performance, simple knowledge transfer techniques for prompt initialization can be effective, and prompt tuning achieves a significant performance boost from pre-training in a low-resource regime. The research offers insights into the advantages and limitations of prompt tuning for unified QA in a few-shot setting, contributing to the development of effective and efficient systems in low-resource scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 59 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.

Builds on

59 of 74 references.

References · 59

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  6. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  7. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  10. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  11. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  12. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
38 more
  1. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  2. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  5. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  6. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  7. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  8. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
  9. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  10. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  11. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  12. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
  13. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  14. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  15. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  16. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 674
  17. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  18. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  19. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
  20. 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 379
  21. 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
  22. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  23. 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
  24. 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
  25. 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 221
  26. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
  27. 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
  28. 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 198
  29. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  30. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  31. 2019DREAM: A Challenge Dataset and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehensioncited by 156
  32. 2021On the Effectiveness of Adapter-based Tuning for Pretrained Language Model Adaptationcited by 147
  33. 2020Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Models for Natural Language Understanding: When and Why Does It Work?cited by 127
  34. 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
  35. 2019"Going on a vacation" takes longer than "Going for a walk": A Study of Temporal Commonsense Understandingcited by 121
  36. 2019Quoref: A Reading Comprehension Dataset with Questions Requiring Coreferential Reasoningcited by 100
  37. 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
  38. 2019Reasoning Over Paragraph Effects in Situationscited by 79

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Gotta: Generative Few-shot Question Answering by Prompt-based Cloze Data Augmentation
  2. 2023MinPrompt: Graph-based Minimal Prompt Data Augmentation for Few-shot Question Answering
  3. 2024Prompting-based Synthetic Data Generation for Few-Shot Question Answering
  4. 2023Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspection
  5. 2022Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering
  6. 2022QAmeleon: Multilingual QA with Only 5 Examples
  7. 2023Improving Zero-shot Visual Question Answering via Large Language Models with Reasoning Question Prompts
  8. 2026Evaluating Prompt Engineering Techniques for RAG in Small Language Models: A Multi-Hop QA Approach