mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLAIR-A: Leveraging Large Language Models to Judge Audio Captions

arXiv 2409.12962 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Automated Audio Captioning (AAC) task asks models to generate natural language descriptions of an audio input. Evaluating these machine-generated audio captions is a complex task that requires considering diverse factors, among them, auditory scene understanding, sound-object inference, temporal coherence, and the environmental context of the scene. While current methods focus on specific aspects, they often fail to provide an overall score that aligns well with human judgment. In this work, we propose CLAIR-A, a simple and flexible method that leverages the zero-shot capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to evaluate candidate audio captions by directly asking LLMs for a semantic distance score. In our evaluations, CLAIR-A better predicts human judgements of quality compared to traditional metrics, with a 5.8% relative accuracy improvement compared to the domain-specific FENSE metric and up to 11% over the best general-purpose measure on the Clotho-Eval dataset. Moreover, CLAIR-A offers more transparency by allowing the language model to explain the reasoning behind its scores, with these explanations rated up to 30% better by human evaluators than those provided by baseline methods. CLAIR-A is made publicly available at https://github.com/DavidMChan/clair-a.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2024.

Builds on

15 of 26 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  6. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  7. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  8. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  9. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  10. 2019Clotho: An Audio Captioning Datasetcited by 354
  11. 2016Improved Image Captioning via Policy Gradient optimization of SPIDErcited by 112
  12. 2023CLAIR: Evaluating Image Captions with Large Language Modelscited by 43
3 more
  1. 2017Automated Audio Captioning with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 40
  2. 2021Can Audio Captions Be Evaluated with Image Caption Metrics?cited by 33
  3. 2024ACES: Evaluating Automated Audio Captioning Models on the Semantics of Soundscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AudioCapBench: Quick Evaluation on Audio Captioning across Sound, Music, and Speech
  2. 2026SonicCaps: Large-Scale Diverse and Fine-Grained Captioning for Improved Audio-Retrieval
  3. 2025Mellow: a small audio language model for reasoning
  4. 2025AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models
  5. 2024An Eye for an Ear: Zero-shot Audio Description Leveraging an Image Captioner using Audiovisual Distribution Alignment
  6. 2025TACOS: Temporally-aligned Audio CaptiOnS for Language-Audio Pretraining
  7. 2026LAMB: LLM-based Audio Captioning with Modality Gap Bridging via Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence
  8. 2026What Did the MLLM Hear? Token-Level Spectro-Temporal Grounding for Audio MLLM Explainability