mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SANE: Strategic Autonomous Non-Smooth Exploration for Multiple Optima Discovery in Multi-modal and Non-differentiable Black-box Functions

arXiv 2409.12295 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Both computational and experimental material discovery bring forth the challenge of exploring multidimensional and multimodal parameter spaces, such as phase diagrams of Hamiltonians with multiple interactions, composition spaces of combinatorial libraries, material structure image spaces, and molecular embedding spaces. Often these systems are black-box and time-consuming to evaluate, which resulted in strong interest towards active learning methods such as Bayesian optimization (BO). However, these systems are often noisy which make the black box function severely multi-modal and non-differentiable, where a vanilla BO can get overly focused near a single or faux optimum, deviating from the broader goal of scientific discovery. To address these limitations, here we developed Strategic Autonomous Non-Smooth Exploration (SANE) to facilitate an intelligent Bayesian optimized navigation with a proposed cost-driven probabilistic acquisition function to find multiple global and local optimal regions, avoiding the tendency to becoming trapped in a single optimum. To distinguish between a true and false optimal region due to noisy experimental measurements, a human (domain) knowledge driven dynamic surrogate gate is integrated with SANE. We implemented the gate-SANE into a pre-acquired Piezoresponse spectroscopy data of a ferroelectric combinatorial library with high noise levels in specific regions, and a piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) hyperspectral data. SANE demonstrated better performance than classical BO to facilitate the exploration of multiple optimal regions and thereby prioritized learning with higher coverage of scientific values in autonomous experiments. Our work showcases the potential application of this method to real-world experiment, where such combined strategic and human intervening approaches can be critical to unlocking new discoveries in autonomous research.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.

Builds on

11 of 58 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  2. 2020Cost-aware Bayesian Optimizationcited by 41
  3. 2020Autonomous Materials Discovery Driven by Gaussian Process Regression with Inhomogeneous Measurement Noise and Anisotropic Kernelscited by 17
  4. 2021Autonomous optimization of nonaqueous battery electrolytes via robotic experimentation and machine learningcited by 16
  5. 2023Human-in-the-loop: The future of Machine Learning in Automated Electron Microscopycited by 11
  6. 2021Non-smooth Bayesian Optimization in Tuning Problemscited by 8
  7. 2022Active learning in open experimental environments: selecting the right information channel(s) based on predictability in deep kernel learningcited by 5
  8. 2024Unraveling the Impact of Initial Choices and In-Loop Interventions on Learning Dynamics in Autonomous Scanning Probe Microscopycited by 5
  9. 2024Bayesian Co-navigation: Dynamic Designing of the Materials Digital Twins via Active Learningcited by 5
  10. 2024Co-orchestration of Multiple Instruments to Uncover Structure-Property Relationships in Combinatorial Librariescited by 4
  11. 2024Towards accelerating physical discovery via non-interactive and interactive multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization: Current challenges and future opportunitiescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.