mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance of Cross-Validated Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation

arXiv 2409.11265 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2024stat.ME stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Advanced methods for causal inference, such as targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), require certain conditions for statistical inference. However, in situations where there is not differentiability due to data sparsity or near-positivity violations, the Donsker class condition is violated. In such situations, TMLE variance can suffer from inflation of the type I error and poor coverage, leading to conservative confidence intervals. Cross-validation of the TMLE algorithm (CVTMLE) has been suggested to improve on performance compared to TMLE in settings of positivity or Donsker class violations. We aim to investigate the performance of CVTMLE compared to TMLE in various settings. Methods: We utilised the data-generating mechanism as described in Leger et al. (2022) to run a Monte Carlo experiment under different Donsker class violations. Then, we evaluated the respective statistical performances of TMLE and CVTMLE with different super learner libraries, with and without regression tree methods. Results: We found that CVTMLE vastly improves confidence interval coverage without adversely affecting bias, particularly in settings with small sample sizes and near-positivity violations. Furthermore, incorporating regression trees using standard TMLE with ensemble super learner-based initial estimates increases bias and variance leading to invalid statistical inference. Conclusions: It has been shown that when using CVTMLE the Donsker class condition is no longer necessary to obtain valid statistical inference when using regression trees and under either data sparsity or near-positivity violations. We show through simulations that CVTMLE is much less sensitive to the choice of the super learner library and thereby provides better estimation and inference in cases where the super learner library uses more flexible candidates and is prone to overfitting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methodscited by 47
  2. 2020Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimatorscited by 10
  3. 2022Practical considerations for specifying a super learnercited by 9
  4. 2017Challenges in Obtaining Valid Causal Effect Estimates with Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 8
  5. 2019A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effectcited by 3
  6. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators via Realistic Simulations in Nutrition Intervention Trialscited by 3
  7. 2018An Easy Implementation of CV-TMLEcited by 2
  8. 2022The Delta-Method and Influence Function in Medical Statistics: a Reproducible Tutorialcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.