mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Narrative Analysis: Unraveling Perceptions of Generative AI

arXiv 2409.11032 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Written texts reflect an author's perspective, making the thorough analysis of literature a key research method in fields such as the humanities and social sciences. However, conventional text mining techniques like sentiment analysis and topic modeling are limited in their ability to capture the hierarchical narrative structures that reveal deeper argumentative patterns. To address this gap, we propose a method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to extract and organize these structures into a hierarchical framework. We validate this approach by analyzing public opinions on generative AI collected by Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, comparing the narratives of supporters and critics. Our analysis provides clearer visualization of the factors influencing divergent opinions on generative AI, offering deeper insights into the structures of agreement and disagreement.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.

Builds on

1 of 17 references.

References · 1

  1. 2021Guided Generation of Cause and Effectcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.