mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CREAM: Comparison-Based Reference-Free ELO-Ranked Automatic Evaluation for Meeting Summarization

arXiv 2409.10883 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred interest in automatic evaluation methods for summarization, offering a faster, more cost-effective alternative to human evaluation. However, existing methods often fall short when applied to complex tasks like long-context summarizations and dialogue-based meeting summarizations. In this paper, we introduce CREAM (Comparison-Based Reference-Free Elo-Ranked Automatic Evaluation for Meeting Summarization), a novel framework that addresses the unique challenges of evaluating meeting summaries. CREAM leverages a combination of chain-of-thought reasoning and key facts alignment to assess conciseness and completeness of model-generated summaries without requiring reference. By employing an ELO ranking system, our approach provides a robust mechanism for comparing the quality of different models or prompt configurations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  5. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  6. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  8. 2021QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarizationcited by 363
  9. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  10. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
  11. 2023BooookScore: A systematic exploration of book-length summarization in the era of LLMscited by 137
  12. 2023Elo Uncovered: Robustness and Best Practices in Language Model Evaluationcited by 58
2 more
  1. 2024Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussionscited by 40
  2. 2024Evaluating RAG-Fusion with RAGElo: an Automated Elo-based Frameworkcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization
  2. 2025Re-FRAME the Meeting Summarization SCOPE: Fact-Based Summarization and Personalization via Questions
  3. 2025Reasoning or Not? A Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning LLMs for Dialogue Summarization
  4. 2023Little Giants: Exploring the Potential of Small LLMs as Evaluation Metrics in Summarization in the Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task
  5. 2025Towards Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM Summarization across Domains and Languages
  6. 2026A Large-Scale Multi-Dimensional Empirical Study of LLMs for Conversation Summarization
  7. 2026Rethinking Meeting Effectiveness: A Benchmark and Framework for Temporal Fine-grained Automatic Meeting Effectiveness Evaluation
  8. 2025You need to MIMIC to get FAME: Solving Meeting Transcript Scarcity with a Multi-Agent Conversations