Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Trust-Region Sequential Quadratic Programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in Scientific Machine Learning (SciML), which integrate physical domain knowledge into an empirical loss function as soft constraints and apply existing machine learning methods to train the model. However, recent research has noted that PINNs may fail to learn relatively complex Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). This paper addresses the failure modes of PINNs by introducing a novel, hard-constrained deep learning method -- trust-region Sequential Quadratic Programming (trSQP-PINN). In contrast to directly training the penalized soft-constrained loss as in PINNs, our method performs a linear-quadratic approximation of the hard-constrained loss, while leveraging the soft-constrained loss to adaptively adjust the trust-region radius. We only trust our model approximations and make updates within the trust region, and such an updating manner can overcome the ill-conditioning issue of PINNs. We also address the computational bottleneck of second-order SQP methods by employing quasi-Newton updates for second-order information, and importantly, we introduce a simple pretraining step to further enhance training efficiency of our method. We demonstrate the effectiveness of trSQP-PINN through extensive experiments. Compared to existing hard-constrained methods for PINNs, such as penalty methods and augmented Lagrangian methods, trSQP-PINN significantly improves the accuracy of the learned PDE solutions, achieving up to 1-3 orders of magnitude lower errors. Additionally, our pretraining step is generally effective for other hard-constrained methods, and experiments have shown the robustness of our method against both problem-specific parameters and algorithm tuning parameters.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.
Builds on
19 of 38 references.
References · 19
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
- 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 205
- 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 156
- 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
- 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applicationscited by 92
- 2020Practical Quasi-Newton Methods for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 68
- 2021Optimal control of PDEs using physics-informed neural networkscited by 52
- 2016Stochastic Quasi-Newton Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37
- 2020Sequential Quadratic Optimization for Nonlinear Equality Constrained Stochastic Optimizationcited by 30
- 2021An Adaptive Stochastic Sequential Quadratic Programming with Differentiable Exact Augmented Lagrangianscited by 25
7 more
- 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
- 2022Adaptive Self-supervision Algorithms for Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2020Training neural networks under physical constraints using a stochastic augmented Lagrangian approachcited by 20
- 2022Physics-informed neural networks for PDE-constrained optimization and controlcited by 19
- 2022Investigating and Mitigating Failure Modes in Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs)cited by 17
- 2024Preconditioning for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2023Constrained Optimization via Exact Augmented Lagrangian and Randomized Iterative Sketchingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025A Model Zoo on Phase Transitions in Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2026Physics-Guided Dimension Reduction for Simulation-Free Operator Learning of Stiff Differential-Algebraic Systemscited by 1
- 2026AdamFLIP: Adaptive Momentum Feedback Linearization Optimization for Hard Constrained PINN Trainingcited by 1
- 2026Unveiling Multi-regime Patterns in SciML: Distinct Failure Modes and Regime-specific Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Unveiling Multi-regime Patterns in SciML: Distinct Failure Modes and Regime-specific Optimization27 May 2026
- 2026AdamFLIP: Adaptive Momentum Feedback Linearization Optimization for Hard Constrained PINN Training8 May 2026
- 2026Physics-Guided Dimension Reduction for Simulation-Free Operator Learning of Stiff Differential-Algebraic Systems21 Apr 2026
- 2025A Model Zoo on Phase Transitions in Neural Networks25 Apr 2025