mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Structured Data Extraction from Diagnostic Reports

arXiv 2409.10576 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Medical and biomedical RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: To develop and evaluate an automated system for extracting structured clinical information from unstructured radiology and pathology reports using open-weights large language models (LMs) and retrieval augmented generation (RAG), and to assess the effects of model configuration variables on extraction performance. Methods and Materials: The study utilized two datasets: 7,294 radiology reports annotated for Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) scores and 2,154 pathology reports annotated for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. An automated pipeline was developed to benchmark the performance of various LMs and RAG configurations. The impact of model size, quantization, prompting strategies, output formatting, and inference parameters was systematically evaluated. Results: The best performing models achieved over 98% accuracy in extracting BT-RADS scores from radiology reports and over 90% for IDH mutation status extraction from pathology reports. The top model being medical fine-tuned llama3. Larger, newer, and domain fine-tuned models consistently outperformed older and smaller models. Model quantization had minimal impact on performance. Few-shot prompting significantly improved accuracy. RAG improved performance for complex pathology reports but not for shorter radiology reports. Conclusions: Open LMs demonstrate significant potential for automated extraction of structured clinical data from unstructured clinical reports with local privacy-preserving application. Careful model selection, prompt engineering, and semi-automated optimization using annotated data are critical for optimal performance. These approaches could be reliable enough for practical use in research workflows, highlighting the potential for human-machine collaboration in healthcare data extraction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and biomedical RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 1 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.

Builds on

1 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Almanac: Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Medicine1 Mar

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evaluating Open-Weight Large Language Models for Structured Data Extraction from Narrative Medical Reports Across Multiple Use Cases and Languages
  2. 2024Development and Testing of Retrieval Augmented Generation in Large Language Models -- A Case Study Report
  3. 2026SIFTING: A Novel LLM-Based Framework for Structured and Transparent Information Extraction from Clinical Free-Text Reports, with Application to Tumor Staging in Lung Cancer
  4. 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Medicine: A Scoping Review of Technical Implementations, Clinical Applications, and Ethical Considerations
  5. 2026Harnessing Large Language Models for Precision Querying and Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Extraction in Clinical Data Science
  6. 2024MRScore: Evaluating Radiology Report Generation with LLM-based Reward System
  7. 2025Leveraging LLMs for Structured Data Extraction from Unstructured Patient Records
  8. 2026Improving Health Literacy through Lay Summarization of Radiological Reports: An Evaluation of BioNER and Retrieval-Augmented Generation