mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AALF: Almost Always Linear Forecasting

arXiv 2409.10142 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent works for time-series forecasting more and more leverage the high predictive power of Deep Learning models. With this increase in model complexity, however, comes a lack in understanding of the underlying model decision process, which is problematic for high-stakes application scenarios. At the same time, simple, interpretable forecasting methods such as ARIMA still perform very well, sometimes on-par, with Deep Learning approaches. We argue that simple models are good enough most of the time, and that forecasting performance could be improved by choosing a Deep Learning method only for few, important predictions, increasing the overall interpretability of the forecasting process. In this context, we propose a novel online model selection framework which learns to identify these predictions. An extensive empirical study on various real-world datasets shows that our selection methodology performs comparable to state-of-the-art online model selections methods in most cases while being significantly more interpretable. We find that almost always choosing a simple autoregressive linear model for forecasting results in competitive performance, suggesting that the need for opaque black-box models in time-series forecasting might be smaller than recent works would suggest.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.

Builds on

10 of 40 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,013
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  4. 2021Monash Time Series Forecasting Archivecited by 267
  5. 2024TFB: Towards Comprehensive and Fair Benchmarking of Time Series Forecasting Methodscited by 249
  6. 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 132
  7. 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
  8. 2019Evaluating time series forecasting models: An empirical study on performance estimation methodscited by 53
  9. 2022Two-stage Human Activity Recognition on Microcontrollers with Decision Trees and CNNscited by 2
  10. 2024Explainable Adaptive Tree-based Model Selection for Time Series Forecastingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.