Convergence of Sharpness-Aware Minimization Algorithms using Increasing Batch Size and Decaying Learning Rate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) algorithm and its variants, including gap guided SAM (GSAM), have been successful at improving the generalization capability of deep neural network models by finding flat local minima of the empirical loss in training. Meanwhile, it has been shown theoretically and practically that increasing the batch size or decaying the learning rate avoids sharp local minima of the empirical loss. In this paper, we consider the GSAM algorithm with increasing batch sizes or decaying learning rates, such as cosine annealing or linear learning rate, and theoretically show its convergence. Moreover, we numerically compare SAM (GSAM) with and without an increasing batch size and conclude that using an increasing batch size achieves a lower worst-case ℓ_∞ adaptive sharpness than compared with using a constant batch size and learning rate.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.
Builds on
39 of 53 references.
References · 39
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 674
- 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 513
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 320
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
27 more
- 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 279
- 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 260
- 2022Surrogate Gap Minimization Improves Sharpness-Aware Trainingcited by 172
- 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 158
- 2022Towards Understanding Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 146
- 2013Mini-batch Stochastic Approximation Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 143
- 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
- 2021Efficient Sharpness-aware Minimization for Improved Training of Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2021Vision Transformer for Small-Size Datasetscited by 122
- 2019Painless Stochastic Gradient: Interpolation, Line-Search, and Convergence Ratescited by 119
- 2023A Modern Look at the Relationship between Sharpness and Generalizationcited by 92
- 2022Make Sharpness-Aware Minimization Stronger: A Sparsified Perturbation Approachcited by 70
- 2019Convergence rates for the stochastic gradient descent method for non-convex objective functionscited by 66
- 2024Friendly Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 53
- 2022SAM as an Optimal Relaxation of Bayescited by 41
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Minimization Leads to Low-Rank Featurescited by 38
- 2023Enhancing Sharpness-Aware Optimization Through Variance Suppressioncited by 37
- 2015On Graduated Optimization for Stochastic Non-Convex Problemscited by 34
- 2016Coupling Adaptive Batch Sizes with Learning Ratescited by 30
- 2023Why Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Generalize Better Than SGD?cited by 28
- 2021On the Convergence of Step Decay Step-Size for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 21
- 2023Practical Sharpness-Aware Minimization Cannot Converge All the Way to Optimacited by 20
- 2019sharpDARTS: Faster and More Accurate Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 19
- 2024Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learningcited by 9
- 2024Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Modelscited by 7
- 2023TRAM: Bridging Trust Regions and Sharpness Aware Minimizationcited by 6
- 2023Using Stochastic Gradient Descent to Smooth Nonconvex Functions: Analysis of Implicit Graduated Optimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.