Do Vision Foundation Models Enhance Domain Generalization in Medical Image Segmentation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance in many supervised learning tasks when the training data distribution matches the test data distribution. However, their performance drops significantly under domain (covariate) shift, a prevalent issue in medical image segmentation due to varying acquisition settings across different scanner models and protocols. Recently, foundational models (FMs) trained on large datasets have gained attention for their ability to be adapted for downstream tasks and achieve state-of-the-art performance with excellent generalization capabilities on natural images. However, their effectiveness in medical image segmentation remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate the domain generalization performance of various FMs, including DinoV2, SAM, MedSAM, and MAE, when fine-tuned using various parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques such as Ladder and Rein (+LoRA) and decoder heads. We introduce a novel decode head architecture, HQHSAM, which simply integrates elements from two state-of-the-art decoder heads, HSAM and HQSAM, to enhance segmentation performance. Our extensive experiments on multiple datasets, encompassing various anatomies and modalities, reveal that FMs, particularly with the HQHSAM decode head, improve domain generalization for medical image segmentation. Moreover, we found that the effectiveness of PEFT techniques varies across different FMs. These findings underscore the potential of FMs to enhance the domain generalization performance of neural networks in medical image segmentation across diverse clinical settings, providing a solid foundation for future research. Code and models are available for research purposes at urlhttps://github.com/kerem-cekmeceli/Foundation-Models-for-Medical-Imagery.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2024.
Builds on
43 of 64 references.
References · 43
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
31 more
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
- 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
- 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,001
- 2022MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and Textcited by 564
- 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 546
- 2019Domain Generalization via Model-Agnostic Learning of Semantic Featurescited by 405
- 2023Segment Anything in High Qualitycited by 373
- 2020Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotationscited by 309
- 2021DAFormer: Improving Network Architectures and Training Strategies for Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
- 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
- 2023Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Digital Pathology: Assess Zero-shot Segmentation on Whole Slide Imagingcited by 161
- 2016Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networkscited by 125
- 2020VerSe: A Vertebrae Labelling and Segmentation Benchmark for Multi-detector CT Imagescited by 111
- 2020Test-Time Adaptable Neural Networks for Robust Medical Image Segmentationcited by 102
- 2023Stronger, Fewer, & Superior: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentationcited by 82
- 2018SynSeg-Net: Synthetic Segmentation Without Target Modality Ground Truthcited by 68
- 2023SAM.MD: Zero-shot medical image segmentation capabilities of the Segment Anything Modelcited by 61
- 2023Can SAM Segment Polyps?cited by 59
- 2023When SAM Meets Medical Images: An Investigation of Segment Anything Model (SAM) on Multi-phase Liver Tumor Segmentationcited by 52
- 2018A Lifelong Learning Approach to Brain MR Segmentation Across Scanners and Protocolscited by 49
- 2024Unleashing the Potential of SAM for Medical Adaptation via Hierarchical Decodingcited by 48
- 2021Local contrastive loss with pseudo-label based self-training for semi-supervised medical image segmentationcited by 43
- 2022Cross-Domain Correlation Distillation for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Nighttime Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
- 2022On-the-Fly Test-time Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 34
- 2019Data Efficient Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Cross-Modality Image Segmentationcited by 33
- 2023Ladder Fine-tuning approach for SAM integrating complementary networkcited by 25
- 2023SAM vs BET: A Comparative Study for Brain Extraction and Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images using Deep Learningcited by 24
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation with Shape Moments for Image Segmentationcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Learning General-Purpose Biomedical Volume Representations using Randomized Synthesiscited by 27
- 2025Zero-shot Domain Generalization of Foundational Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation: An Experimental Studycited by 3
- 2026Understanding the Transfer Limits of Vision Foundation Modelscited by 2
- 2026VoxCor: Training-Free Volumetric Features for Multimodal Voxel Correspondencecited by 1
- 2025REMSA: Foundation Model Selection for Remote Sensing via a Constraint-Aware Agentcited by 0
- 2026Are Natural-Domain Foundation Models Effective for Accelerated Cardiac MRI Reconstruction?cited by 0
- 2026VoxCor: Training-Free Volumetric Features for Multimodal Voxel Correspondence13 May 2026
- 2026Are Natural-Domain Foundation Models Effective for Accelerated Cardiac MRI Reconstruction?24 Apr 2026
- 2026Understanding the Transfer Limits of Vision Foundation Models22 Jan 2026
- 2025REMSA: Foundation Model Selection for Remote Sensing via a Constraint-Aware Agent21 Nov 2025
- 2025Zero-shot Domain Generalization of Foundational Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation: An Experimental Study28 Mar 2025
- 2024Learning General-Purpose Biomedical Volume Representations using Randomized Synthesis4 Nov 2024