mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAGent: Retrieval-based Access Control Policy Generation

arXiv 2409.07489 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manually generating access control policies from an organization's high-level requirement specifications poses significant challenges. It requires laborious efforts to sift through multiple documents containing such specifications and translate their access requirements into access control policies. Also, the complexities and ambiguities of these specifications often result in errors by system administrators during the translation process, leading to data breaches. However, the automated policy generation frameworks designed to help administrators in this process are unreliable due to limitations, such as the lack of domain adaptation. Therefore, to improve the reliability of access control policy generation, we propose RAGent, a novel retrieval-based access control policy generation framework based on language models. RAGent identifies access requirements from high-level requirement specifications with an average state-of-the-art F1 score of 87.9%. Through retrieval augmented generation, RAGent then translates the identified access requirements into access control policies with an F1 score of 77.9%. Unlike existing frameworks, RAGent generates policies with complex components like purposes and conditions, in addition to subjects, actions, and resources. Moreover, RAGent automatically verifies the generated policies and iteratively refines them through a novel verification-refinement mechanism, further improving the reliability of the process by 3%, reaching the F1 score of 80.6%. We also introduce three annotated datasets for developing access control policy generation frameworks in the future, addressing the data scarcity of the domain.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2024.

Builds on

33 of 84 references.

References · 33

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  7. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  8. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  9. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  10. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  11. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  12. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
21 more
  1. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  2. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
  3. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
  4. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  5. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
  6. 2023LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Executioncited by 239
  7. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  8. 2024Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 197
  9. 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
  10. 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworkscited by 179
  11. 2019Simple BERT Models for Relation Extraction and Semantic Role Labelingcited by 154
  12. 2022Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Surveycited by 138
  13. 2021Generate & Rank: A Multi-task Framework for Math Word Problemscited by 82
  14. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Database: Storage and Retrieval Technique, Challengecited by 55
  15. 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
  16. 2020Exploring Data Splitting Strategies for the Evaluation of Recommendation Modelscited by 48
  17. 2022Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learnerscited by 48
  18. 2023Errors are Useful Prompts: Instruction Guided Task Programming with Verifier-Assisted Iterative Promptingcited by 46
  19. 2018Explainable Securitycited by 15
  20. 2023SoK: Access Control Policy Generation from High-level Natural Language Requirementscited by 5
  21. 2021Human Factors in Security Research: Lessons Learned from 2008-2018cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AutoCedar: An Agentic Framework for Verifier-Guided Access Control Policy Synthesis
  2. 2025On Automating Security Policies with Contemporary LLMs
  3. 2026Sketch-based Access Control: A Multimodal Interface for Translating User Preferences into Intent-Aligned Policies
  4. 2026Policy-aware Vector Search: A Vision for Fine Grained Access Control in Vector Databases
  5. 2025Permissioned LLMs: Enforcing Access Control in Large Language Models
  6. 2025OrgAccess: A Benchmark for Role Based Access Control in Organization Scale LLMs
  7. 2026RAISE: Reinforcing Access Control Policy Synthesis in LLMs via Symbolic Evaluation
  8. 2025SafeRAG: Benchmarking Security in Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Model