mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

User Preferences for Large Language Model versus Template-Based Explanations of Movie Recommendations: A Pilot Study

arXiv 2409.06297 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2024cs.IR cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems have become integral to our digital experiences, from online shopping to streaming platforms. Still, the rationale behind their suggestions often remains opaque to users. While some systems employ a graph-based approach, offering inherent explainability through paths associating recommended items and seed items, non-experts could not easily understand these explanations. A popular alternative is to convert graph-based explanations into textual ones using a template and an algorithm, which we denote here as ''template-based'' explanations. Yet, these can sometimes come across as impersonal or uninspiring. A novel method would be to employ large language models (LLMs) for this purpose, which we denote as ''LLM-based''. To assess the effectiveness of LLMs in generating more resonant explanations, we conducted a pilot study with 25 participants. They were presented with three explanations: (1) traditional template-based, (2) LLM-based rephrasing of the template output, and (3) purely LLM-based explanations derived from the graph-based explanations. Although subject to high variance, preliminary findings suggest that LLM-based explanations may provide a richer and more engaging user experience, further aligning with user expectations. This study sheds light on the potential limitations of current explanation methods and offers promising directions for leveraging large language models to improve user satisfaction and trust in recommender systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

Builds on

11 of 18 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  7. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
  8. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  9. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Studycited by 192
  10. 2018RippleNet: Propagating User Preferences on the Knowledge Graph for Recommender Systemscited by 136
  11. 2022Personalized Prompt Learning for Explainable Recommendationcited by 79

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LLM-Powered Explanations: Unraveling Recommendations Through Subgraph Reasoning
  2. 2026Sequence-aware Large Language Models for Explainable Recommendation ↗
  3. 2024Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
  4. 2026RobustExplain: Evaluating Robustness of LLM-Based Explanation Agents for Recommendation
  5. 2024Reasoning over User Preferences: Knowledge Graph-Augmented LLMs for Explainable Conversational Recommendations
  6. 2025Bridging Collaborative Filtering and Large Language Models with Dynamic Alignment, Multimodal Fusion and Evidence-grounded Explanations
  7. 2024ReasoningRec: Bridging Personalized Recommendations and Human-Interpretable Explanations through LLM Reasoning
  8. 2023How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey