mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaking Neural Network Scaling Laws with Modularity

arXiv 2409.05780 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modular neural networks outperform nonmodular neural networks on tasks ranging from visual question answering to robotics. These performance improvements are thought to be due to modular networks' superior ability to model the compositional and combinatorial structure of real-world problems. However, a theoretical explanation of how modularity improves generalizability, and how to leverage task modularity while training networks remains elusive. Using recent theoretical progress in explaining neural network generalization, we investigate how the amount of training data required to generalize on a task varies with the intrinsic dimensionality of a task's input. We show theoretically that when applied to modularly structured tasks, while nonmodular networks require an exponential number of samples with task dimensionality, modular networks' sample complexity is independent of task dimensionality: modular networks can generalize in high dimensions. We then develop a novel learning rule for modular networks to exploit this advantage and empirically show the improved generalization of the rule, both in- and out-of-distribution, on high-dimensional, modular tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

53 of 67 references.

References · 53

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  5. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  6. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  7. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  8. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  9. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  10. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
  11. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  12. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
38 more
  1. 2022Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Modelscited by 249
  2. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  3. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
  4. 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
  5. 2019A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal Mechanismscited by 158
  6. 2020Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Soft Modularizationcited by 138
  7. 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 129
  8. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  9. 2017Routing Networks: Adaptive Selection of Non-linear Functions for Multi-Task Learningcited by 125
  10. 2021Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pre-training and Fine-tuning Transformerscited by 105
  11. 2017Learning Independent Causal Mechanismscited by 104
  12. 2020Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspacescited by 99
  13. 2020Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Maskscited by 97
  14. 2021Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regimecited by 95
  15. 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 87
  16. 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
  17. 2023Modular Deep Learningcited by 82
  18. 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 79
  19. 2019Learning to Control Self-Assembling Morphologies: A Study of Generalization via Modularitycited by 68
  20. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  21. 2018A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networkscited by 64
  22. 2022Factorizing Knowledge in Neural Networkscited by 59
  23. 2018Modular meta-learningcited by 51
  24. 2019Routing Networks and the Challenges of Modular and Compositional Computationcited by 49
  25. 2020Learning to Combine Top-Down and Bottom-Up Signals in Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention over Modulescited by 38
  26. 2021Fast and Slow Learning of Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 36
  27. 2018Automatically Composing Representation Transformations as a Means for Generalizationcited by 35
  28. 2022Is a Modular Architecture Enough?cited by 35
  29. 2019Modular Meta-Learning with Shrinkagecited by 31
  30. 2020Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in over-parameterized modelscited by 26
  31. 2021Avoiding Catastrophe: Active Dendrites Enable Multi-Task Learning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 24
  32. 2022How Much More Data Do I Need? Estimating Requirements for Downstream Taskscited by 22
  33. 2019Side-Tuning: A Baseline for Network Adaptation via Additive Side Networkscited by 16
  34. 2018Learning Quickly to Plan Quickly Using Modular Meta-Learningcited by 15
  35. 2021How Modular Should Neural Module Networks Be for Systematic Generalization?cited by 15
  36. 2021Learning curves for Gaussian process regression with power-law priors and targetscited by 14
  37. 2021Compositional Attention: Disentangling Search and Retrievalcited by 12
  38. 2020Sample complexity and effective dimension for regression on manifoldscited by 8

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.