Assessing the Uncertainty and Robustness of the Laptop Refurbishing Software
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Refurbishing laptops extends their lives while contributing to reducing electronic waste, which promotes building a sustainable future. To this end, the Danish Technological Institute (DTI) focuses on the research and development of several robotic applications empowered with software, including laptop refurbishing. Cleaning represents a major step in refurbishing and involves identifying and removing stickers from laptop surfaces. Software plays a crucial role in the cleaning process. For instance, the software integrates various object detection models to identify and remove stickers from laptops automatically. However, given the diversity in types of stickers (e.g., shapes, colors, locations), identification of the stickers is highly uncertain, thereby requiring explicit quantification of uncertainty associated with the identified stickers. Such uncertainty quantification can help reduce risks in removing stickers, which, for example, could otherwise result in software faults damaging laptop surfaces. For uncertainty quantification, we adopted the Monte Carlo Dropout method to evaluate six sticker detection models (SDMs) from DTI using three datasets: the original image dataset from DTI and two datasets generated with vision language models, i.e., DALL-E-3 and Stable Diffusion-3. In addition, we presented novel robustness metrics concerning detection accuracy and uncertainty to assess the robustness of the SDMs based on adversarial datasets generated from the three datasets using a dense adversary method. Our evaluation results show that different SDMs perform differently regarding different metrics. Based on the results, we provide SDM selection guidelines and lessons learned from various perspectives.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 839
13 more
- 2023GLIGEN: Open-Set Grounded Text-to-Image Generationcited by 781
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 540
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
- 2021Benchmarking Detection Transfer Learning with Vision Transformerscited by 131
- 2018Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: Capture Uncertainty in the Deep Neural Network For Lidar 3D Vehicle Detectioncited by 82
- 2018Bayesian Layers: A Module for Neural Network Uncertaintycited by 57
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification of Collaborative Detection for Self-Drivingcited by 46
- 2019Accurate, reliable and fast robustness evaluationcited by 43
- 2024Reality Bites: Assessing the Realism of Driving Scenarios with Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2021Prediction Surface Uncertainty Quantification in Object Detection Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 10
- 2023Pretrain, Prompt, and Transfer: Evolving Digital Twins for Time-to-Event Analysis in Cyber-physical Systemscited by 7
- 2023EvoCLINICAL: Evolving Cyber-Cyber Digital Twin with Active Transfer Learning for Automated Cancer Registry Systemcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Lab to Factory: Pitfalls and Guidelines for Self-/Unsupervised Defect Detection on Low-Quality Industrial Images
- 2025Anomaly Object Segmentation with Vision-Language Models for Steel Scrap Recycling
- 2026Trustworthy Visual Quality Inspection under Data Scarcity in Manufacturing
- 2025Evaluating Contextual Intelligence in Recyclability: A Comprehensive Study of Image-Based Reasoning Systems
- 2025Semi-Supervised Defect Detection via Conditional Diffusion and CLIP-Guided Noise Filtering
- 2026Industrial Surface Defect Detection via Diffusion Generation and Asymmetric Student-Teacher Network
- 2025Sequential PatchCore: Anomaly Detection for Surface Inspection using Synthetic Impurities
- 2024AnomalySD: Few-Shot Multi-Class Anomaly Detection with Stable Diffusion Model